Ashley Roughton#3912

Ashley Roughton

Ashley Roughton is an intellectual property barrister who specialises in all aspects of Intellectual Property Law and associated areas of Competition Law. He is a graduate chemist and has postgraduate specialisms in biochemistry.

Ashley has appeared in the European Court of Justice, the Court of First Instance, the Court of Appeal (both criminal and civil), the High Court (Chancery and Queen's Bench Divisions), the Divisional Court (both civil and criminal), the County Court (both general and patents) the Crown Court, the magistrates' court, the trade marks registry and the patent office.

Chambers & Partners 2012
In Intellectual Property: "Ashley Roughton has a broad practice that takes in both technically demanding patent work and complex trade mark litigation. He is known for his discreet handling of sensitive issues, and in recent times he has been engaged in a series of disputes relating to design rights of various types."
Contributed to

20

Data protection and image rights under the DPA 1998 [Archived]
Data protection and image rights under the DPA 1998 [Archived]
Practice Notes

This Practice Note has been archived and is not maintained. It provides information on the position under the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA 1998). It is for background information only.

A request has been made for personal data under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FIA 2000), that has
A request has been made for personal data under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FIA 2000), that has
Q&A

This Q&A considers which Act, the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FIA 2000) or the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA 1998) takes priority over the other. It also considers if FIA 2000, s 40 means that the information cannot be provided pursuant to the DPA 1998.

After a one off data sharing has taken place, which complies with the DPA 1998, what are the ongoing
After a one off data sharing has taken place, which complies with the DPA 1998, what are the ongoing
Q&A

This Q&A considers a data contoller’s obligations where data has been shared on a one-off basis.

Are there any specific legal requirements around email journaling?
Are there any specific legal requirements around email journaling?
Q&A

This Q&A considers whether there are any specific legal requirements around email journaling.

Can a business that used a third-party owned photograph, which was sent directly to them, on their
Can a business that used a third-party owned photograph, which was sent directly to them, on their
Q&A

This Q&A explores the circumstances in which copyright infringement can arise through the use of a photograph for promotional materials. It covers copyright ownership in photographs, implied licensing, and the application of notice and takedown exceptions to liability.

Can a party use pictures that have been obtained from social media as evidence in legal proceedings?
Can a party use pictures that have been obtained from social media as evidence in legal proceedings?
Q&A

This Q&A considers the copyright and data protection issues which arise where a party to proceedings wishes to use photographs taken from social media as evidence.

Following a proposed change in suppliers (for example, transferring to a new provider of outsourced
Following a proposed change in suppliers (for example, transferring to a new provider of outsourced
Q&A

This Q&A considers whether a data subject’s consent required when transferring personal data from one service provider to another.

For service out of jurisdiction for a patent infringement claim to an entity in France, do the patents
For service out of jurisdiction for a patent infringement claim to an entity in France, do the patents
Q&A

This Q&A considers the need to translate a patent into French for service out of jurisdiction in a patent infringement claim relating to an entity in France.

In a B2B contract for the sale of goods incorporating software, can you exclude the right of the buyer to
In a B2B contract for the sale of goods incorporating software, can you exclude the right of the buyer to
Q&A

This Q&A looks at whether it is possible to exclude the right of the buyer to reverse engineer the goods for the buyer's own repair purposes in a B2B contract for the sale of goods incorporating software and considers competition issues and confidential information.

In light of Barbulescu v. Romania [2016] IRLR 235, how does this impact the head office of the employer
In light of Barbulescu v. Romania [2016] IRLR 235, how does this impact the head office of the employer
Q&A

This Q&A considers the impact of Barbulescu v. Romania [2016] IRLR 235 decision on the head office of the employer and IT employees (both based outside of the EU) accessing employee's (based in the UK) personal emails.

Is there any guidance or case law regarding whether there is a genuine use of a trade mark within the EU
Is there any guidance or case law regarding whether there is a genuine use of a trade mark within the EU
Q&A

This Q&A looks into rules and relevant case law relating to genuine use of a trade mark within the EU, where a party provides their services outside of the EU, but where those services can be booked from within the EU.

Once a trade mark has been registered, is it possible to amend the specification to add additional
Once a trade mark has been registered, is it possible to amend the specification to add additional
Q&A

This Q&A looks at amending the specification of a trade mark after registration.

What damages are recoverable for stress and inconvenience resulting from a breach of personal data and
What damages are recoverable for stress and inconvenience resulting from a breach of personal data and
Q&A

This Q&A considers the damages that are recoverable for stress and inconvenience resulting from a breach of personal data and what test will be applied when assessing these.

What is a relevant filing system for the purposes of the Data Protection Act 1998?
What is a relevant filing system for the purposes of the Data Protection Act 1998?
Q&A

This Q&A considers what a relevant filing system for the purposes of the Data Protection Act 1998.

What is the difference between a joint data controller and a data controller in common?
What is the difference between a joint data controller and a data controller in common?
Q&A

This Q&A considers the difference between a joint data controller and a data controller in common.

What is the effect and purpose of the Press Notice of the European Patent Office of 29 June 2017 relating
What is the effect and purpose of the Press Notice of the European Patent Office of 29 June 2017 relating
Q&A

This Q&A considers the effect and purpose of the Press Notice of the European Patent Office of 29 June 2017 concerning plants and animals obtained exclusively by an essentially biological breeding process.

What is the position where a former client (who is now a defendant in proceedings brought by their former
What is the position where a former client (who is now a defendant in proceedings brought by their former
Q&A

This Q&A considers the position where a former client becomes a defendant in proceedings brought by their former solicitors firm and makes a request under the Data Protection Act 1998 for documents in the solicitor’s file pertaining to him while he had instructed the firm.

What is the position where there is a conflict between a party's contractual and statutory obligations
What is the position where there is a conflict between a party's contractual and statutory obligations
Q&A

This Q&A considers the statutory regime for data protection and how to reconcile a conflict between statutory and contractual obligations.

When should I delete personal data?
When should I delete personal data?
Q&A

This Q&A considers when personal data should be deleted.

Where the trade mark portfolio for a global brand has been split between different proprietors in the EU,
Where the trade mark portfolio for a global brand has been split between different proprietors in the EU,
Q&A

This Q&A takes into consideration the situation where there is an economic link between proprietors, such as members of a corporate family.

Practice Areas

Panels

  • Case Analysis Panel
  • Contributing Author
  • Other Publications
  • Q&A Panel

Qualified Year

  • 1992

Membership

  • International Association for the Protection of Industrial Property (Council member), European Circuits, Intellectual Property Bar Association, Bar Eu

Education

  • B.Sc. (Eng) (Hons) (Lond)
  • Ph.D. (Cantab)
  • Dip.Law. (Westminster)
  • M.Sc (Econ) (City)
  • B.Sc (Mol Sci) (Open)
  • M.Sc (Biochem)(Lond)

If you expected to see yourself on this page, click here.