It is noted that the risk of extending the time for responding to a section 45 notice would be with the landlord and not the tenant, however, if the tenant agrees to the extension, but the terms of acquisition cannot be agreed, does the tenant then have to the apply to the County Court under section 49 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 (LRHUDA 1993) to determine the terms of acquisition? Can an application still be made to the First-tier Tribunal under LRHUDA 1993, s 48? If an application has been made to the County Court under LRHUDA 1993, s 49, does it have to be made within six months from the date stated in the section 42 notice or the extended date agreed by the parties?