Adam Carvalho#774

Adam Carvalho

Legal Director, Myerson Solicitors LLP
Adam Carvalho is a Legal Director in the Contentious Trusts and Probate Team at Myerson who specialises in complex and high-value contentious trust and probate work.

Adam trained, qualified and worked as a senior associate and partner in a central London firm in the Tier 1 nationally for Contentious Trust and Probate work.

Adam has considerable experience of ultra-high value litigation, cross-jurisdictional matters and disputes in non-UK courts. Adam has litigated in the Supreme Court, Court of Appeal, and advised in relation to complex matters in courts from Bermuda to New Zealand.

 Adam is a full STEP Member and has frequently been involved in private wealth matters involving complicated succession planning and trustee applications.

 Adam is known for his constructive, pragmatic advice, his down to earth approach, and his technical knowledge. Adam is a firm believer in focusing on the main issues and providing sound and accessible advice.


Contributed to

29

Administration of trusts—indemnities and exemption clauses
Administration of trusts—indemnities and exemption clauses
Practice notes

This Practice Note, written by Adam Carvalho of Myerson, considers two of the ways in which trustees limit their personal liability (trustees’ limitation of liability) arising from their roles, namely indemnities and exoneration clauses in trust instruments.

Administration of trusts—trustee decision making
Administration of trusts—trustee decision making
Practice notes

This Practice Note, written by Adam Carvalho of Myerson, addresses trustee decision making. It considers the decision making process, the option of applying to the court where there are doubts about a decision and the potential remedies available to trustees where decisions have been made and issues have subsequently arisen.

Art law—authenticity, provenance and attribution of artworks
Art law—authenticity, provenance and attribution of artworks
Practice notes

This Practice Note, written by Adam Carvalho of Myerson, examines disputes in relation to the authenticity of artworks, being the attribution of a work to a particular artist. It covers a broad range of issues that can arise in relation to attribution claims and examines significant cases.

Art law—bailment
Art law—bailment
Practice notes

This Practice Note, written by Adam Carvalho of Myerson, considers how bailment issues may arise in the context of art law. It explains what bailment is, gives examples of bailments which Private Client practitioners may come across, as well as other types of claim such as conversion. The Practice Note also considers bailment in a commercial context and discusses the parallels and distinctions between bailments and trusts.

Art law—introduction for Private Client practitioners
Art law—introduction for Private Client practitioners
Practice notes

This Practice Note, written by Adam Carvalho of Myerson, provides an introduction to art law for Private Client practitioners and those advising wealthy individuals and trustees. It considers transactional issues and contentious issues, particularly surrounding ownership of art, as well as tax and wealth planning involving works of art. The Practice Note also highlights further reading and areas of potential interest to practitioners in this sector.

Art law—negligence
Art law—negligence
Practice notes

This Practice Note, written by Adam Carvalho of Myerson, considers negligence claims against auctions houses and valuers in relation to works of art. It covers negligence in relation to the attribution of artwork, the duty and standard of care of auction houses and valuers and the quantification of damages where negligence is found.

Art law—restitution
Art law—restitution
Practice notes

This Practice Note, written by Adam Carvalho of Myerson, deals with restitution in an art law context. Restitution under English law aims to restore to an innocent party the gains that someone else has obtained from them. While the Practice Note focuses on the issue from the perspective of English law, it includes a broad overview of the key issues in international restitution.

Charity litigation key case—Children’s Investment Fund Foundation (UK) v Attorney General [Archived]
Charity litigation key case—Children’s Investment Fund Foundation (UK) v Attorney General [Archived]
Practice notes

This Practice Note, written by Adam Carvalho of Myerson, discusses the Supreme Court case of Children’s Investment Fund Foundation (UK) v Attorney General which provides an illustration of the way in which a large philanthropic trust can become embroiled in matrimonial disputes. It illustrates a number of issues relating to charity litigation.

Charity litigation key case—HM Attorney General v Zedra Fiduciary Services [Archived]
Charity litigation key case—HM Attorney General v Zedra Fiduciary Services [Archived]
Practice notes

This Practice Note, written by Adam Carvalho of Myerson, discusses the case of HM Attorney General v Zedra Fiduciary Services which provides a practical illustration of the court’s approach to construing the meaning of a charitable trust, the court’s initial consideration of different types of schemes and procedural points relevant to charity litigation of this nature. Subsequently in the 2022 case the court approved the Attorney-General's proposed cy-près scheme to reduce the National Debt.

Charity litigation key case—Quan v Bray [Archived]
Charity litigation key case—Quan v Bray [Archived]
Practice notes

This Practice Note, written by Adam Carvalho of Myerson, discusses the case of Quan v Bray which provides an interesting illustration of the way in which a large philanthropic trust can become embroiled in ‘big money’ matrimonial litigation and the numerous issues relating to charity litigation.

Charity litigation—charity proceedings
Charity litigation—charity proceedings
Practice notes

This Practice Note, written by Adam Carvalho of Myerson, is about charity proceedings. They relate to the internal administration of a charity or its domestic affairs.

Charity litigation—compromising charity litigation
Charity litigation—compromising charity litigation
Practice notes

This Practice Note, written by Adam Carvalho of Myerson, covers the compromise of charity litigation. It includes consideration of the general requirement on litigants to try to settle disputes, the power to compromise and implement settlement terms, as well as charity trustees’ duties.

Charity litigation—costs
Charity litigation—costs
Practice notes

This Practice Note, written by Adam Carvalho of Myerson, covers the costs position in charity litigation. It considers the costs rules as they apply to charity trustees. It also considers the cost rules for litigation involving the attorney general and realtors and whether charity trustees can be indemnified for the costs of litigation from charity funds. It considers applications to the Charity Commission under section 105 of the Charities Act 2022 for an order authorising the use of charity funds for litigation and applications pursuant to section 110 to the Charity Commission to ask it for advice.

Charity litigation—should a charity engage in litigation?
Charity litigation—should a charity engage in litigation?
Practice notes

This Practice Note, written by Adam Carvalho, considers whether a charity should engage in litigation—be it initiating or defending proceedings. It sets out considerations for trustees of charities—whether CIOs, corporates, trusts, membership bodies or otherwise—who are involved in or contemplating civil litigation. It looks at the principles of charity trustee decision making in the context of litigation.

Charity trustees—conflicts of interest
Charity trustees—conflicts of interest
Practice notes

This Practice Note, written by Adam Carvalho of Myerson, considers conflicts of interests and charities. It looks at the key principles and unauthorised benefits. It also considers the position for an incorporated charity under the Companies Act 2006.

Charity trustees—decision-making
Charity trustees—decision-making
Practice notes

This Practice Note, written by Adam Carvalho of Myerson, provides an overview of the principles of charity trustee decision-making in England and Wales. It considers the information gathering process, the relevant factors to consider when making a decision, irrelevant factors and procedural matters. It also considers the review of charity trustee decision-making a Charity Commission advice.

Enforcement of orders in the Court of Protection
Enforcement of orders in the Court of Protection
Practice notes

This Practice Note, written by Adam Carvalho of Myerson, outlines the powers of the Court of Protection to enforce orders made by the court, covering the contempt of court provisions in the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (COPR 2017) and also the COPR 2017 powers to make committal orders and civil restraint orders and other enforcement methods from the CPR 1998 that are imported into the COPR 2017.

Evidence in the Court of Protection
Evidence in the Court of Protection
Practice notes

This Practice Note, written by Adam Carvalho of Myerson, outlines the rules relating witness evidence and expert evidence in the Court of Protection. The use of witness statements, witness summaries, summons and depositions are explained, as are section 49 reports and the rules around admissibility of evidence. In respect of expert evidence, this Practice Note covers restrictions on expert evidence, duties of experts and guidance for experts.

Practice and procedure–CPR Part 57–probate and inheritance claims
Practice and procedure–CPR Part 57–probate and inheritance claims
Practice notes

This Practice note, written by Adam Carvalho of Myerson, considers CPR Part 57 as it relates to probate and inheritance claims. It focuses on probate claims, claims for rectification, claims to substitute or remove a personal representative and claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975.

Probate actions—fraud and forgery
Probate actions—fraud and forgery
Practice notes

This Practice Note, written by Adam Carvalho of Myerson, examines those occasions where it is suspected that a Will is either a forgery, where a Will has been destroyed other than by the testator, or where a person propounds a Will that they know to be false. The burden of proof in these situations is also considered.

Practice Area

Panels

  • Case Analysis Panel
  • Contributing Author
  • Q&A Panel

Qualified Year

  • 2009

Membership

  • STEP

If you expected to see yourself on this page, click here.