Walker Morris

Experts

8

Filter by: Practice area
Alan Harper
Partner
Walker Morris
David Kilduff
Partner
Walker Morris
Jeanette Burgess
Solicitor
Walker Morris
Liz Graham
Solicitor
Walker Morris
Lucie Bryan
Walker Morris
Oliver Wheeler
Senior Associate
Walker Morris
Russell Kelsall
Solicitor, Partner
Walker Morris
Ruth Bamforth
Barrister
Walker Morris
Contributions by Walker Morris

1

Concession contracts procurement—before 18 April 2016 [Archived]
Concession contracts procurement—before 18 April 2016 [Archived]
Practice notes

ARCHIVED: This Practice Note has been archived and is not maintained. This Practice Note provides an overview of the public procurement regime for concession contracts prior to the introduction of the Concession Contracts Regulations 2016, which came into force on 18 April 2016, implementing the Directive 2014/23/EU. This Practice Note states the law prior to 18 April 2016 and is not maintained. It is for background information only.

Contributions by Walker Morris Experts

9

Assisting the homeless pre-3 April 2018 applications [Archived]
Assisting the homeless pre-3 April 2018 applications [Archived]
Practice notes

ARCHIVED: This Practice Note has been archived and is not maintained. It sets out the main homelessness duties owed by local housing authorities (LHA) in England and Wales pre-implementation of the Homelessness Reduction Act 2017 on 3 April 2018. It explains the different duties owed in England and Wales, together with the assistance offered in each jurisdiction and remains relevant for all English applications made prior to 3 April 2018. It is for background information only.

Charities and the Local Government Pension Scheme
Charities and the Local Government Pension Scheme
Practice notes

This Practice Note, produced in partnership with Ruth Bamforth of Walker Morris, considers the particular pensions issues which arise when a charity takes on outsourced services from a local authority which participates in the LGPS. The LGPS is a defined benefit occupational pension scheme which provides pension benefits for, broadly speaking, local authorities and private sector contractors who have been admitted to participation.

EU Payment Accounts Directive
EU Payment Accounts Directive
Practice notes

The Payment Accounts Directive (PAD) is intended to enhance transparency and comparability for consumers in respect of payment accounts. The PAD makes it easier for consumers to compare fees charged by banks and other service providers across the EU, facilitates consumer switching of payment accounts and entitles all EU consumers to open a payment account that enables them to perform essential functions such as receiving their salary and paying bills. This Practice Note provides a background to, and gives an overview of, the provisions of the PAD and the technical standards and guidelines made under it.

New and emerging technology—protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights
New and emerging technology—protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights
Practice notes

This Practice Note focuses on the intellectual property (IP) aspects relating to the development of new and emerging technology, provides practical advice for parties engaging in collaborative working and the key considerations for protecting and enforcing their IP rights.

Rationalisation of property holdings [Archived]
Rationalisation of property holdings [Archived]
Practice notes

ARCHIVED: This Practice Note has been archived is not maintained. Rationalisation of the ownership, occupation, management and use of property holdings to provide a more efficient and cost effective solution has assumed growing importance in the public sector. This Practice Note identifies the legal and commercial issues associated with acquisition, construction and disposal of government buildings.

What IP assets a business may own and how best to protect them
What IP assets a business may own and how best to protect them
Practice notes

This Practice Note explains the types of intellectual property (IP) rights which a business might own, including trade marks, designs, copyright, databases, and patented or patentable technology. It is an introductory guide which can assist the business when reviewing its IP portfolio, conducting an audit or deciding what IP protection to secure for its assets. See also Practice Notes: Protecting and enforcing intellectual property rights and Exploiting intellectual property rights.

Application notice seeking a declaration that a transaction is void under section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986
Application notice seeking a declaration that a transaction is void under section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986
Precedents

This Precedent, produced in partnership with Oliver Wheeler of Walker Morris LLP, is a draft application notice seeking a declaration that a transaction is void under section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986.

Witness statement in support of an application for a declaration that a transaction is void under section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986
Witness statement in support of an application for a declaration that a transaction is void under section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986
Precedents

This Precedent is a witness statement in support of a claim by a liquidator in a compulsory liquidation seeking a declaration that a transaction is void under section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986.

Other Work
Patent Court up in ‘arms’ over the inventive step and infringement by an equivalent (JCB v Manitou)
Patent Court up in ‘arms’ over the inventive step and infringement by an equivalent (JCB v Manitou)

IP analysis: This case involved the assessment of four patents owned by JCB. JCB alleged that the patents had been infringed by Manitou who then counterclaimed for their revocation. The judgment contains a detailed analysis of the validity of the patents. The case also discusses the challenges involved in identifying the inventive step. His Honour Judge (HHJ) Hacon also considered the assessment of infringement, including a claim for infringement by an equivalent. Three of the patents (EP 065, EP 965 and GB 595) were invalidated for obviousness over the prior art. The fourth patent (EP 382) however was deemed to be valid and held to have been infringed by Manitou. Interestingly, much of the analysis regarding the inventive concept and infringement by an equivalent was addressed in a confidential annex. As a result, some of the rationale behind the judgment is not public. Written by Alan Harper, Intellectual Property partner at Walker Morris LLP.

If you expected to see yourself on this page, click here.