News 2
CASE HUB
ARCHIVED—this archived case hub reflects the position at the date of the decision of 12 January 2023; it is no longer maintained.
See further, timeline.
Case facts
| Outline | A national reference from Czechia seeking clarification regarding the evidence disclosure under the EU Damages Directive 2014/104/EU (the Damages Directive). |
| Latest developments | On 12 January 2023, the Court of Justice held (amongst other things) that a national court may order the disclosure of certain evidence for the purpose of proceedings for damages connected with an alleged infringement of competition law, even if the proceedings have been stayed owing to the Commission’s initiation of an investigation concerning the same infringement. That court must, however, ensure that the disclosure of the relevant evidence is actually necessary and proportionate for the purpose of the action for damages and complies with the Damages Directive. |
| Parties | Applicant:• RegioJet a.s. (RegioJet)Respondent:• České dráhy, a.s. (České dráhy): České dráhy is the State owned railway company. |
| Market | Railway services. |
| Background to reference | BackgroundOn 25 January 2012, the Czech Competition Authority opened an investigation |
Access this content for free with a 7 day trial of LexisNexis and benefit from:
- Instant clarification on points of law
- Smart search
- Workflow tools
- 42 practice areas
Get your quote today and take step closer to being able to benefit from:
- Instant clarification on points of law
- Smart search
- Workflow tools
- 36 practice areas
Get a LexisNexis quote
* denotes a required field
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it,
sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.
Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
Related documents:
Practice notes 10
- Case C- 25/21 Repsol Comercial de Productos Petrolíferos [Archived]
- Case C- 264/23 Booking.com and Booking.com (Deutschland) v 25hours Hotel Company Berlin GmbH and Oth...
- Case C- 302/13 AS flyLAL-Lithuanian Airlines [Archived]
- Case C- 449/21 Towercast [Archived]
- Case C- 536/11 Donau Chemie [Archived]
- Case C- 557/12 Kone and others [Archived]
- Case C- 617/17 Powszechny Zakład Ubezpieczeń na Życie S.A. w Warszawie v Prezes Urzędu Ochrony v Pre...
- Case C- 681/11 Schenker and others [Archived]
- Case C- 819/19 Stichting Cartel Compensation and Others [Archived]
- Case C- 525/16 Meo—Serviços de Comunicações e Multimédia (discriminatory pricing) [Ar...
CONTACT US
