Checklists 1
Hostile takeovers and defence tactics—the legal and regulatory restrictions
Published by a LexisNexis Corporate expert
Practice notesHostile takeovers and defence tactics—the legal and regulatory restrictions
Published by a LexisNexis Corporate expert
Practice notesThis Practice Note, produced with input from Rebecca Cousin of Slaughter and May on market practice, discusses some of the main defensive tactics an offeree might seek to deploy when facing an imminent or actual unwelcome takeover offer and looks at the legal and regulatory restrictions on the taking of defensive action.
When a company is, or predicts that it may be, subject to a takeover offer which is, or may become, hostile, it is likely to seek to employ a number of defensive tactics to either see off the offeror altogether or to encourage the offeror to increase its offer.
Such defensive tactics or frustrating actions are limited by both law and the provisions of the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (Code).
Code restrictions on frustrating action
The Code contains restrictions on frustrating action, which limit the extent to which an offeree may take action which may frustrate an offer without the approval of its shareholders or the consent of the Panel, and which have particular application in the context of an unwelcome
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it,
sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.
Related documents:
Flowcharts 1
News 4
Practice notes 1
Q&As 5
- What potential liabilities does a financial adviser face when providing a ‘fairness opinion’ on a ta...
- How are shares held by an offeror’s parent treated for the purposes of the squeeze-out rights on a t...
- Have you any guidance in respect of recent trends in public M&A deals?
- Can a single takeover offer be given to different shareholders over several days or does it have to...
- Does a squeeze out notice need to be sent to all dissenting shareholders who have not agreed to the...