US—punitive damages insurability state law survey
Published by a LexisNexis Insurance & Reinsurance expert
Practice notesUS—punitive damages insurability state law survey
Published by a LexisNexis Insurance & Reinsurance expert
Practice notesBy Randy J. Maniloff, White and Williams LLP, and Jeffrey W. Stempel
This survey covers the insurability of punitive damages. Coverage includes all 50 US states and the District of Columbia. The issue is framed as whether a particular state's public policy permits a tortfeasor to insure against punitive damages that the tortfeasor may become legally obligated to pay. The availability of insurance coverage for punitive damages frequently arises in the context of uninsured and underinsured motorist policies. This survey makes some references to the issue in the context of uninsured and underinsured motorist policies, but primarily focuses on liability insurance and is not intended to be an exhaustive list.
For related information, see Practice Note: US—punitive damages standards state law survey.
State | Insurability of punitive damages |
Alabama | The Supreme Court of Alabama, without discussion of any public policy considerations, held that punitive damages were a ‘liability imposed by law,’ and, as such, within the coverage afforded by an automobile policy's insuring agreement, which provided: ‘To indemnify the assured…against loss from the liability imposed |
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it,
sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.