Home / EU Law

Legal News

ESMA final report sets out guidelines on stress test scenarios under the EU MMF Regulation

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
Published on: 14 February 2022
Published by LNB News

LNB News 14/02/2022

Document Information

Issue Date: 14 February 2022

Published Date: 14 February 2022

Jurisdiction(s): European Union

Article summary

Article 28 of the EU Money Markets Funds Regulation (MMF Regulation) provided that the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) would develop guidelines with a view to establishing common reference parameters of the stress test scenarios to be included in the stress tests that MMFs or managers of MMFs are required to conduct.

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
European Union

Related documents:

2 Checklists
1 Flowcharts
4 News
View More
5 Practice notes
View More
Powered by Lexis+®

Related documents:

2 Checklists
1 Flowcharts
4 News
View More
5 Practice notes
View More

Popular documents

If planning permission imposes restrictions on a licensed premises opening hours, once operational can

If planning permission imposes restrictions on a licensed premises opening hours, once operational can the personal licence holder apply for a Temporary Events Notice (TEN) to open for longer hours than those permitted in the planning permission?To use any property for a licensable activity both

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a

Financial clean break orders in family proceedings

Financial clean break orders in family proceedingsDuty of the court to consider a clean breakAlthough there is no presumption in favour of there being a financial clean break between parties on divorce, the court is under a duty to consider whether it would be appropriate to exercise its powers so

Where are misrepresentations made? Jurisdictional traps for the unwary (Bellmare Holdings Ltd v Wells)

Dispute Resolution analysis: The High Court has provided concise guidance as to how misrepresentation should be analysed when considering jurisdictional gateways. Under Article 5(3) of the Lugano Convention, in negligent misstatement cases, the place of the event giving rise to damage is normally