Home / Insurance & Reinsurance

Legal News

Insurer hits back at business over coronavirus (COVID-19) closure payout

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
Published on: 08 September 2023
Published by a Law360 reporter

Article summary

Law360, London: An insurer has hit back against a claim for losses incurred by a machine component manufacturer during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, arguing that the policy provides this type of cover for only a three-month period.

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Related documents:

4 News
View More
7 Practice notes
View More
1 Q&As
Powered by Lexis+®

Related documents:

4 News
View More
7 Practice notes
View More
1 Q&As

Popular documents

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a

Financial clean break orders in family proceedings

Financial clean break orders in family proceedingsDuty of the court to consider a clean breakAlthough there is no presumption in favour of there being a financial clean break between parties on divorce, the court is under a duty to consider whether it would be appropriate to exercise its powers so

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance taxWhile interest often accrues on overdue tax, the late payment of certain taxes may also attract a penalty. For information on the interest accruing on overdue tax, see Practice Notes: IHT—payment deadlines on death—Interest on IHT and Interest on late paid

Brussels I (recast)—domicile (Arts 4 and 63) [Archived]

Brussels I (recast)—domicile (Arts 4 and 63) [Archived]ARCHIVED: This Practice Note has been archived and is not maintained.This Practice Note considers the general rule set out in Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 1215/2012, Brussels I (recast) when determining the relevance of a defendant’s domicile to