UK antitrust investigations and appeals

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) investigates allegations of anti-competitive behaviour that have an impact in the UK (breaches of Chapter I and/or Chapter II of the Competition Act 1998). Investigations are carried out under the Competition Act 1998 (CA 1998).

Investigations can start in one of four ways:

  1. a company involved in wrongdoing blowing the whistle

  2. an individual involved in wrongdoing blowing the whistle

  3. a complaint from a third party, or

  4. the CMA receiving general market intelligence suggesting a breach of competition law.

If an investigation is launched, it will follow a set process. Investigations can take several years to complete.

If the CMA finds that competition law has been breached, it can impose severe penalties on undertakings, including large fines.

If a potential investigation involves a regulated sector where the sectoral regulator has concurrent competition powers, an investigation may be carried out by either the sectoral regulator or the CMA (see below).

For a review of the investigation process, see CMA behavioural investigation process. For a flowchart setting out the different stages of

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Competition News

Competition weekly highlights—11 December 2025

This week's edition of Competition weekly highlights includes, from a UK perspective: (1) the CMA's decision that Vandemoortele/Délifrance merger meets the test for reference to phase 2, (2) the CMA's decision to launch a strategic review of legacy merger remedies, (3) a Court of Appeal's judgment upholding the dismissal of LetterOne's compensation claim following a NSI Act 2021 divestment order, (4) a High Court judgment dismissing Brazilian orange growers' cartel damages claims as time-barred under Brazilian law, and (5) publication by the CMA Microeconomics Unit of a report on technology, productivity and competition. This week's highlights also include, from an EU perspective: (1) a General Court judgment reducing Intel's ‘naked restrictions’ fine but rejecting annulment, (2) a General Court judgment dismissing an action against the Commission's rejection of a complaint in the Fire Protection Bogies case, (3) the Commission's decision to launch an investigation into Meta's restrictions on AI providers' access to WhatsApp, (4) the Commission's decision to launch an investigation into Google's use of publisher and YouTube content for AI training, (5) the Commission's decision to unconditionally clear Mars/Kellanova after phase II, (6) the Commission's decision to refer TIL/Hutchison Ports/TERCAT to phase II, (7) Meta's commitment to give EU users choice on personalised ads under DMA, and (8) a General Court judgment dismissing an action against the Commission's decision to approve restructuring aid of €2.55bn granted to Portugal to TAP.

View Competition by content type :

Popular documents