Key features of construction disputes

This subtopic looks at key features of construction disputes and issues to take into account when dealing with such disputes. It provides an introduction to common types of construction claims, considerations to be made during the early stages of a dispute, types of dispute resolution (DR) methods available, key aspects of conducting construction disputes, and the DR provisions in standard form building contracts.

Introduction to construction claims

The nature of construction projects and the law surrounding them means that claims are commonly made by both parties to construction contracts, both under the terms of the contract (for example, claims for additional time to complete the works) and for other breaches. These may be resolved in accordance with the contractual procedure for such claims, but can also escalate to formal disputes. There are a number of routes used for resolution of construction disputes, such as adjudication or litigation in the Technology and Construction Court (TCC), which are discussed below.

Practice Note: Common claims under construction contracts provides an overview of claims that typically arise under construction contracts including in relation to defects, extensions of time, variations to

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Construction News

Scottish Government launches consultation on housing delivery incentives and penalties

The Scottish Government has launched  a consultation seeking views on measures to accelerate the build-out of homes on sites already identified for housing development, in response to falling housing starts and completions despite a substantial pipeline of consented land. The consultation supports the Housing Emergency Action Plan and related planning commitments, and examines whether incentives, penalties or other interventions could increase delivery rates, including for small and medium-sized housebuilders, within a plan-led, infrastructure-first framework under National Planning Framework 4. It is informed by evidence that slow delivery is driven primarily by post-consent factors such as market absorption rates, viability constraints, infrastructure costs, public sector risk exposure and limited developer capacity or commitment, rather than by the planning permission process itself. Drawing on previous reviews and research by bodies including the Competition and Markets Authority and the Scottish Land Commission, the consultation outlines potential approaches such as land assembly, public sector-led development, reform of compulsory purchase and sales powers, and policy tools to influence build-out rates, and notes that any future action may require legislative change in the next parliamentary session and would be subject to appropriate impact assessment. The consultation closes on 30 April 2026.

View Construction by content type :

Popular documents