Tort for construction lawyers

The general law of contract and the law of tort are central elements of construction law. The principles of tort examined in this subtopic therefore underpin the construction law topics that are covered in Construction and, for construction lawyers, present an additional set of considerations and risks.

A ‘tort’ is a civil wrong that occurs where someone unfairly causes another person to suffer loss or harm.

A person committing a tort is legally liable to the party injured, who is provided with a remedy in law, such as monetary damages or an injunction to compel or prevent certain conduct. An injured party who decides to pursue the matter in court is known as the claimant, and the person alleged to be responsible for the damage is the defendant or tortfeasor.

In the context of a construction project, tortious liability can arise in a number of different ways. This sub-topic examines the most common form of tort law, negligence, and breach of statutory duty. It also considers

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Construction News

The JCT Management Building Contract 2024—what’s changed?

Construction analysis: On 5 March 2024, the Joint Contracts Tribunal (JCT) published the 2024 editions of its Construction Management Contract and Management Building Contract, alongside 2024 editions of Framework Agreement, Dispute Adjudication Board Documentation, Adjudication Agreement, and Project Bank Account Documentation. In this analysis, we focus on the Management Building Contract, and look at how it differs from its 2016 equivalent.

S&P Global publishes February 2025 UK Construction PMI report

S&P Global has published its February 2025 UK Construction Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) report, indicating a sharp decline in construction output. The PMI registered 44.6 in February 2025, down from 48.1 in January 2025, representing the lowest level in nearly five years.

Singapore Court of Appeal—Singapore award partially set aside for breach of natural justice (Wan Sern Metal v Hua Tian Engineering)

Arbitration analysis: The Singapore Court of Appeal partially allowed the appeal by Wan Sern Metal Industries Pte Ltd (the appellant) against an arbitral award in favour of Hua Tian Engineering Pte Ltd (the respondent) and partially set aside the award. The arbitration was conducted on an expedited, documents-only basis. The respondent introduced a claim for ‘expectation damages’ in its written submissions which was not part of the parties' agreed list of issues. The appellant opposed the claim in reply submissions. The arbitrator granted this claim inter alia on the basis that the appellant did not object to or address the respondent's measure of damages. unpleaded, the arbitrator oversimplified the appellant's case and therefore ascribed an incorrect position to the appellant, resulting in an award made in breach of natural justice. Written by Yu-Jin Tay, Kay-Jannes Wegner and Charles Tay of Mayer Brown PK Wong & Nair Pte Ltd.

DBT updates guidance on payment practices and performance reporting requirements

The Department for Business and Trade (DBT) has updated its guidance on statutory payment practices and performance reporting requirements for companies and limited liability partnerships, adding new reporting requirements for businesses with reporting periods that started in January 2025 and specific reporting changes for businesses with qualifying construction contracts, which came into effect on 1 March 2025. The guidance also reflects upcoming regulatory changes, including changes to the thresholds for defining medium-sized companies, effective from April 2025.