Adjudicator’s fees, payless notices, and the residential occupier’s exception (RBH v James)
Construction analysis: This combined adjudication enforcement and Part 8 claim considered various issues arising out of an adjudicator’s decision. The contractor, RBH, had applied for payment of c.£663k, and had been successful in an adjudication on a ‘smash and grab’ basis. The employer successfully resisted summary enforcement on the basis that it had an arguable case that it was a residential occupier, within the meaning of section 106 of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (HGCRA 1996)—believed to be the first reported instance in which this defence to summary judgment has succeeded. The employer had also issued a Part 8 claim and successfully persuaded the court that its ‘Notice of intention to withhold payment’ was a valid payless notice. Finally, the court made obiter comments on the effect of its decision on the adjudicator’s decision on his fees. Written by Oli Worth, partner at Archor LLP and James Frampton, barrister at Keating Chambers.