NEC contracts

NEC contracts

About the NEC contracts

The NEC4 suite of contracts was published by the Institution of Civil Engineers on 22 June 2017. Some minor amendments were published in March 2019 (see News Analysis: Amendments to NEC4 contracts published), a second set of amendments was published in October 2020 (see News Analysis: NEC4 contracts—October 2020 amendments) and a third set was published in January 2023.

The previous suite of NEC contracts, NEC3, was published in 2005 and then revised in 2013 (see Practice Note: NEC3 contracts—April 2013 changes [Archived]).

For information about the key differences between NEC3 and NEC4, see Practice Note: NEC4 contracts—what’s changed? [Archived].

The NEC3 and NEC4 forms (together referred to as NEC contracts) are written in a different style of language and use different terminology to most other standard form contracts, and focus on good project management, co-operation and communication. The core principles are flexibility, simplicity and clarity and a stimulus for good management. For a glossary of NEC terms, see Practice Note: NEC contracts—glossary.

The contracts are designed to be flexible so that they can be used for all types of

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Construction News

Assessing deductions to damages—increased benefits resulting from mitigation and loss of chance (Barrowfen v Patel)

Construction analysis: The Court of Appeal (CoA) dismissed both an appeal and cross-appeal in relation to the High Court’s calculation of damages in a case where the claimant’s mitigation actions resulted in an increased benefit to the company. The CoA applied the authorities in relation to mitigation losses and gains in a case concerning breach of fiduciary duty and professional negligence, and held that only benefits and losses flowing from a continuous course of conduct to deal with the breaches or negligence should be considered—once mitigation actions are complete, any further decisions by the injured party which incur costs or losses can not be taken into account in any damages claim. The CoA also held that the increased benefit amount must be deducted from the damages payable before applying a loss of a chance percentage. The CoA allowed a cross-appeal on a small point relating to interest.

HM Treasury publishes working paper on 10 Year Infrastructure Strategy

HM Treasury (HMT) has published a working paper, detailing the government's plans for its 10 Year Infrastructure Strategy. The Strategy aims to address uncertainty in infrastructure planning and policy, which has hindered investment and increased costs for consumers, by providing a long-term plan for social, economic, and housing infrastructure. It will outline an institutional framework to support its implementation, detailing the role of public financing institutions such as the National Wealth Fund and aligning with other strategic initiatives, such as the Industrial Strategy. Key aspects include the creation of the National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority to oversee implementation and alignment with a new long-term spending framework, setting capital budgets for at least five years. The Strategy will focus on three main objectives: enabling resilient growth, delivering clean energy, and supporting public services. It will be developed alongside the Spending Review, with both set for publication in June 2025.

Pay now argue later? (ATG Services (Scotland) Ltd v Ogilvie Construction Ltd)

Construction analysis: In October 2024, the Court of Session enforced an adjudicator's award against Ogilvie Construction Ltd. This award followed ‘sSmash and Grab’ adjudication proceedings where ATG sought payment of an application for payment in the sum of circa £1.1m—the notified sum. Ogilvie argued that the award was unenforceable as the adjudicator had materially breached the rules of natural justice in reaching his decision. Ogilvie was unsuccessful in defending the enforcement action in court. Indeed, their defence was said to have been ‘frivolous’. Much was written about this judgement at the time. However, while it is true that the court will enforce Adjudicator's awards, contractors (or payer's) are likely to continue to challenge them, particularly when large sums of money are involved which a party feels is not due. Written by Erica Johnston, senior associate at Brodies LLP.

Homes England updates CCS guidance

Homes England has updated its guidance on the Cladding Safety Scheme (CSS). In the 'CCS overview' guidance, the section on 'Social sector applicants — financial viability applications' has been amended to include specific factors that Homes England considers when making funding decisions. Additionally, in the 'Applying for funding for the CCS' guidance, the 'Practical completion — scheme exit' section has been updated to indicate that when practical completion is achieved, residents and leaseholders must be informed and provided with a link to the leaseholder and residents' survey.