Other forms of business vehicle

This overview is a guide to the content within the Other forms of business vehicle subtopic, with links to the appropriate materials.

Choosing a business vehicle

It is important that the most appropriate form of vehicle is chosen to carry on a business—the choice of vehicle may have a bearing on the business’s success or failure.

There is not one vehicle that will suit the needs and demands of every business. Each vehicle has its advantages and disadvantages. The decision as to which vehicle to use to carry on a particular business will be complex and dependent on various legal, tax and commercial considerations—there may not be a perfect fit.

In addition, the vehicle originally chosen to carry on a particular business may not continue to be the right choice of vehicle for that business as it develops and matures. The vehicle chosen to carry on a business should be kept under periodic review. If the original choice of vehicle to carry on a business becomes inappropriate, an alternative vehicle may take over the business, although a change of vehicle may be complicated and costly,

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Corporate News

High Court dismisses judicial review relating to Government order requiring Russian-backed investment firm to sell broadband provider under the NSIA 2021

Corporate analysis: LetterOne Core Investment, S.A.R.L. and another) v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industry, concerning a judicial review of a final order made pursuant to section 26(3) of the National Security and Investment Act 2021 (NSIA 2021) made by the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy requiring LetterOne to sell broadband business Upp Corp Ltd on national security grounds (Final Order). The High Court dismissed the challenge.

CP24/2: FCA further consults on enforcement transparency proposals

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has issued the second phase of its consultation paper CP24/2 on proposals to increase transparency in enforcement investigations. This follows significant concerns raised in response to the original consultation. The FCA is now seeking further views on the practical implementation of the public interest test, with the FCA Board aiming to reach a final decision in the first quarter of 2025. This consultation forms part of the FCA's broader reforms to enhance the pace and focus of its enforcement efforts. Responses are sought by 17 February 2025.

Corporate weekly highlights—28 November 2024

This week's edition of Corporate weekly highlights includes publication by the FRC of its Annual Review of Corporate Governance Reporting for 2024, the Pre-Emption Group’s second annual report on the adoption of its updated Statement of Principles on the disapplication of pre-emption rights for UK listed companies, and news of fines imposed by the FCA on Barclays and a former executive of Wizz Air. It also includes the publication by the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero of a summary of responses to its October 2023 call for evidence on Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions reporting, and the Companies House 2024–5 Christmas and New Year opening times.

FCA fines former Wizz Air executive for MAR breaches

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has imposed a £123,500 fine on former chief supply chain officer at Wizz Air, András Sebők, for breaching Articles 19(1) and 19(11) of the UK Market Abuse Regulation (MAR). Sebők, acting in his capacity as a person discharging managerial responsibility (PDMR), traded the company's shares during restricted periods and failed to disclose his trades within the required timeframe. This is the first time the FCA has fined a PDMR for trading company shares during closed periods under Article 19(11) of MAR, and the second time it has fined a PDMR for failing to disclose personal trades under Article 19(1) of MAR.