Pensions

This Overview outlines the Practice Note material available in our Pensions subtopic.

Pensions—general considerations for employment lawyers

Payment into pension schemes that are registered with Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC) has significant tax advantages for both employers and employees (see: ‘The pensions tax regime’ below). Pension schemes are also a way of attracting and retaining employees.

Under European law pension benefits are considered to be deferred pay, so they are subject to the principle of 'equal pay for equal work'. A significant amount of indirect discrimination litigation has occurred in the past few years; the majority of which had been brought by part-time workers, the majority of whom are women.

Employers may run occupational pension schemes for the benefit of their employees. Occupational pension schemes tend to be either 'final salary' (also known as 'defined benefit') schemes or 'money purchase' (also known as 'defined contribution') schemes:

  1. final salary schemes commit the scheme, under the deed and rules, to paying members a set annuity on retirement

  2. money purchase schemes require employees and employers to pay a set amount each year into the scheme, usually expressed as a percentage of

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Employment News

Withholding DSAR documents from inspection during data protection proceedings by relying on a Data Protection Act 2018 exemption (Cole v Marlborough College)

Information Law analysis: This claim relates to the scope of production and the application of the exemptions to production of personal data in responding fully to a subject access request. The Claimant, Thomas Cole (Cole), who was a student at the Defendant school, Marlborough College (the College), submitted a data subject access request (DSAR) under Article 15 of the United Kingdom General Data Protection Regulation, Assimilated Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (the UK GDPR) after he was removed from the school following his involvement in a physical altercation with another student. In this half-day case management hearing, Mr Justice Nicklin assessed whether the College was entitled to withhold, in whole or part, documents containing Cole’s personal data, rather than providing the material for inspection ahead of a two-day trial on the data protection claim expected to start in mid-2025. The court held that the College was entitled to withhold some documents (containing Cole’s personal data) on the grounds of the exemption in paragraph 16 of Schedule 2, Part 3 to the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA 2018). In short, this exemption provides that a controller is not obliged to disclose information to a data subject where doing so involves disclosing information that relates to another individual who can be identified from that information, whether as the source of information or as the subject of such information. Written by Robyn Bond, associate at Ropes & Gray International LLP.

View Employment by content type :

Popular documents