Judicial and environmental review

Judicial review of environmental decisions

Duty of candour and disclosure requirements in judicial review provides the means to challenge the lawfulness of decisions made, actions or inactions by public bodies (or bodies exercising a public function). Judicial review cannot be used to review the merits of a decision but only the lawfulness of the way in which it was made. Consequently, challenges generally relate to the decision making process and/or to the question of whether the decision was irrational in the Wednesbury sense (ie the decision falls outside the spectrum of reasonableness).

Environmental judicial review claims launched by campaigning NGOs or individuals have typically concerned issues such as alleged failure to carry out an environmental impact assessment before consenting to development or activity (eg the building of a waste development site/plant or a wind farm) which it is alleged will cause environmental harm. Typical defendants are the Secretary of State, local authorities or the Environment Agency.

Judicial review is also frequently the appropriate mechanism in disputes between regulators and regulated businesses or activities (eg disputes concerning the waste status of metal scrap or feedstock for energy

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Environment News

Environment weekly highlights—21 November 2024

This week's edition of Environment weekly highlights includes: analysis on the consultation on expanding tax conditionality to new sectors, the case of Smallbrook v BCC, considering the tension between proposals seeking to reuse and repurpose buildings and those seeking to demolish and rebuild them and will be of relevance to those involved in regeneration projects which consider the two alternatives, and what businesses need to know about ASA, AI and greenwashing. It also covers developments at the 29th Conference of the Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP29), the Office for Environmental Protection (OEP) and Green Alliance (GA) being granted permission to intervene in the appeal of R (Rights Community Action Ltd) v the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government [2024] EWHC 1693 (Admin) and the launch of the Global Clean Power Alliance at G20 summit. In addition this week, the Department for Energy Security and Net zero (DESNZ) has announced of plans to introduce legislation aimed at restricting the future licensing of new coal mines in the UK the Office for Environmental Protection (OEP) has launched an investigation into the legality of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra)’s Statutory Guidance on applying the Farming Rules for Water, , the Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (DAERA) Minister, Andrew Muir, has announced an independent review of environmental governance in Northern Ireland, Defra has announced an update on the implementation of the Deposit Return Scheme (DRS) for drinks containers, reaffirming its commitment to launching the DRS across England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland in October 2027 and the Environment Agency (EA) has launched a consultation titled ‘River basin planning: working together 2024’, as the first consultation in the process of reviewing and updating river basin management plans (RBMPs) for 2027.

View Environment by content type :

Popular documents