Environmental reporting

There has been a significant growth in reporting instruments globally, with the Task Force on Climate-Related Disclosures (TCFD) leading the charge on climate disclosures and the Task Force on Nature-related Disclosures (TNFD) providing a sister framework for nature disclosures.

For further details, see Practice Notes: Mandatory environmental reporting and disclosure—Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures and ESG and sustainability—biodiversity—Reporting and disclosure.

While companies are required to comply with mandatory reporting requirements, many companies are adopting voluntary reporting frameworks to indicate what actions they are taking to address environmental and social issues (such as human rights and modern slavery). There are many diverse drivers for why companies are voluntarily reporting on environmental matters, including to:

•
gain a better understanding of its exposure to environmental and climate change risks
•
adopt and report on its environmental social governance (ESG) or corporate social responsibility (CSR) commitments
•
help it better understand and comply with mandatory reporting requirements
•
demonstrate good practice
•
join an environmental or ethical index
•
respond to elevated stakeholder activism pressuring companies to report on ESG performance
•
provide information to investors

Mandatory reporting for private sector

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Environment News

Environmental enforcement round-up—20 December 2024

A round-up of the latest environmental enforcement, including two men sentenced after operating an illegal waste site on their land and doing nothing to prevent it.

Defra publishes EPR guidance on recycling obligations and waste disposal fees

The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) has published new guidance on extended producer responsibility (EPR) for packaging. The guidance details new requirements for UK organisations that supply or import packaging, including collecting and reporting packaging data, fulfilling recycling obligations, and obtaining evidence of packaging waste recycling through Packaging Recycling Notes and Packaging Export Recycling Notes. It details the transition from the National Packaging Waste Database to the new Report Packaging Data service for managing these obligations. Additionally, the guidance introduces waste disposal fees for large organisations, set to begin in October 2025. Defra has also published updated illustrative base fees for the first year of EPR for packaging, refining previous estimates from August and September 2024, now providing single figure estimates instead of ranges. It has also published draft guidance explaining the methodology and procedure used to calculate estimated EPR payments for local authorities (LAs) for the 2025-26 period. Defra is seeking feedback on both the estimates and the guidance, with plans to publish an updated version in Spring 2025.

Commission bans Bisphenol A in food contact materials

The European Commission has adopted a ban on the use of Bisphenol A (BPA) in food contact materials, citing potential harmful health impacts. The ban, which follows a positive vote by EU Member States and scrutiny by the Council and European Parliament, is based on the European Food Safety Authority's latest scientific assessment. It includes an 18-month phase-out period for most products and extends to other harmful bisphenols affecting reproductive and endocrine systems. The Commission states this measure aims to maintain high food safety standards and protect EU citizens from harmful chemicals in food and drink contact materials.

Shell wins dutch climate appeal but faces ongoing pressure to align CO2 reductions with human rights obligations

Environment analysis: This analysis provides details on the appeal of an important climate change case: Friends of the Earth Netherlands et al v Royal Dutch Shell plc, case number 200.302.332/01. The analysis explains why the original 2021 judgment ordering Royal Dutch Shell to reduce their emissions by 45% was overturned in the Hague Court of Appeal in November 2024. Despite, the appeal court ruling that Shell were not obliged to reduce their emissions as set out in the original judgment, they did affirm that there is broad consensus that the protection against the threats of climate change is considered a fundamental human right. Further important comments were also made and discussed in this analysis. Written by Noa Brawerman & Colleen Theron at Ardea International.