EU antitrust - Article 102 TFEU

Dominance

Article 102 TFEU prohibits undertakings that (individually or collectively) hold a dominant position within the EU or a substantial part of it from abusing their dominance (without objective justification) insofar as it may affect trade between Member States. This provision is mirrored in the national competition laws of EU Member States and which can apply even where an effect on inter-state trade is not established.

The distinction between abusive and legitimate (permissible) conduct by a dominant undertaking may be hard to discern—for example, a price reduction resulting from production efficiencies/economies as opposed to a ‘predatory’ price cut. Dominant undertakings are permitted (and indeed expected) to compete aggressively on a given market but such behaviour should reflect competition ‘on the merits’.

The application of Article 102 TFEU has three constituent elements:

  1. establishing ‘dominance’

  2. confirming prima facie restrictive unilateral conduct, and

  3. assessing whether there is ‘objective justification’ for any such conduct—if not (and only then) can the conduct in question legally be construed as an ‘abuse’

For further information, see Practice Notes: Article 102 TFEU—the prohibition on abuse of dominance and Dominant

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest EU Law News

Commission launches consultation to revise the EU Cybersecurity Act and strengthen the EU cybersecurity framework

The European Commission launched a call for evidence to support the preparation of a legislative proposal to revise the EU Cybersecurity Act. The initiative aims to strengthen EU cyber resilience, update the mandate of the EU Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) and improve the effectiveness of the European Cybersecurity Certification Framework. The Commission noted that the cybersecurity landscape has become significantly more complex and threat‑intensive since the Act’s adoption in 2019, while subsequent EU legislation has expanded ENISA’s tasks beyond its original mandate, creating the need to streamline, simplify and supplement the existing framework to ensure coherence, reduce administrative burdens and improve implementation for businesses and users. The initiative focuses on measures to support a secure and resilient Information and Communication Technology supply chain and the EU cybersecurity industrial base, addresses shortcomings in the certification framework such as slow adoption, unclear roles, limited agility and insufficient clarity on covered risks, including non‑technical factors, and considers alignment with newer instruments such as the Cyber Resilience Act. The Commission outlined policy options ranging from non‑legislative measures to targeted or comprehensive regulatory revision, stating that EU‑level action is required to prevent internal market fragmentation and to secure long‑term economic and social benefits through greater harmonisation, stronger cybersecurity and resilience, more efficient incident response and enhanced protection of fundamental rights, including personal data. The call for evidence will run until 20 June 2025.

View EU Law by content type :

Popular documents