WTO

WTO

This subtopic contains the following guidance on the WTO:

•
Practice Note: WTO-an introductory guide provides

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest EU Law News

EMA publishes guidelines on Specific AR FUQs

On 28 November 2024, the European Medicines Agency (EMA)’S Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee adopted new guidelines on the use of specific adverse reaction follow-up questionnaires (Specific AR FUQs) in routine pharmacovigilance activities. The guidelines, set to take effect on 1 February 2025, outline when and how to use Specific AR FUQs, recommending their use for safety concerns that may impact a product's benefit-risk balance. The document provides guidance for Marketing Authorisation Holders (MAHs) on developing Specific AR FUQs, as well as considerations for their discontinuation and removal. It also details requirements for the content, format, and dissemination of Specific AR FUQs. The EMA notes that the guidelines do not intend to modify MAHs' internal policies for FUQs.

Dutch SA fines Netflix €4.75m for EU GDPR violations

The Dutch Supervisory Authority (SA) has imposed a €4.75m fine on Netflix for failing to adequately inform customers about its data processing practices in its privacy statement, violating several General Data Protection Regulation, Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (EU GDPR), provisions, particularly those under Articles 5, 12, 13, and 15. The decision, made on 26 November 2024, followed an investigation initiated by complaints from an Austrian NGO. The Dutch SA found that Netflix's privacy statement lacked clarity regarding the purposes and the legal basis for data collection and use, the extent of data sharing with third parties, data retention periods, and safeguards for international data transfers. The matter was handled as a cross-border case under the One-Stop-Shop procedure.

Restrictions on the use of personal data by social networks for direct marketing (Schrems v Meta Platforms Ireland)

EU Law analysis: Privacy activist Maximilian Schrems brought a claim against Meta Platforms Ireland (Meta) before the Austrian courts, alleging that Meta was unlawfully processing his personal data. Meta had directed targeted advertising at Schrems that reflected his interests as perceived by Meta, including his sexual orientation. The Austrian Supreme Court referred two questions to the Court of Justice. In its judgment, the Court of Justice held that principle of data minimisation prevents unrestricted aggregation, analysis and processing of personal data obtained by a data controller from data subjects or third parties for the purposes of targeted advertising. The Court of Justice also held that data concerning sexual orientation that are manifestly made public by an individual may be processed–but that this does not amount to the individual’s consent to the processing of other data relating to their sexual orientation, obtained using partner third-party websites, for the purposes of enabling personalised advertising. Written by Rohan Massey, partner, and Cameron Grabowski, trainee solicitor, at Ropes & Gray International LLP.

EIOPA publishes Q&A on DORA

The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) has published a new Q&A on what types of services should be considered Information Communication Technologies (ICT) services for the purpose of Article 3(21) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 (the Digital Operational Resilience Act or DORA).