General principles

When drafting or negotiating the terms of an order, it is good practice to consider the potential enforcement of that order and ensure that it sets out exactly what has to be done, any dates by which that action is required and that any undertakings are clear. The terms and consequences of a breach of an undertaking must be explained to the parties.

The rules governing the enforcement of orders within family proceedings are primarily contained in Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010), SI 2010/2955, Pt 33, which imports relevant provisions of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998, SI 1998/3132, with modifications. FPR 2010, SI 2010/2955, Pt 37, together with FPR 2010, PD 37A, apply regarding applications and proceedings in relation to contempt of court. FPR 2010, SI 2010/2955, Pts 39 and 40, together with FPR 2010, PD 40A, apply in relation to attachment of earnings orders, charging orders, stop orders and stop notices.

Regard should also be had to requirements for leave and limitation periods, see Practice Note: Limitations on enforcement.

Enforcing financial orders

FPR 2010 introduced an ability to apply to

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Family News

Family weekly highlights—21 November 2024

This week’s edition of Family considers the interface between property law and financial remedy in the context of bankruptcy and the role of the financial dispute resolution hearing in financial remedy proceedings. Four new flowcharts setting out the steps to be taken in applications for financial provision after overseas divorce or dissolution and applications for pension sharing orders are set out, together with details of a new webinar on AI and family law.

Exceptional reasons required to bypass FDRs (GH v GH)

Family analysis: In GH v GH, Mr Justice Peel confirmed the importance of the financial dispute resolution hearing (FDR) and that bypassing this hearing to go from first appointment to final hearing is only appropriate in exceptional circumstances. This applies even where financial positions are not fully crystallised at the time of the FDR.

Family weekly highlights—14 November 2024

This week's edition of Family weekly highlights includes details of the latest Family Procedure Rule Committee meeting minutes, the President of the Family Division’s address to the British Society of Paediatric Radiologists and the Family Justice Council’s 17th annual debate. Judgments in relation to parental orders, charging orders and overseas adoption are considered. Details of a new toolkit on Scottish family law are set out.

The interface between property law and financial remedy in the context of bankruptcy (DDR v BDR)

Family analysis: This judgment shows the court adopting a highly structured approach to the determination of questions of property law prior to the determination of a financial remedy application against a backdrop of bankruptcy proceedings, procedural and evidential confusion and limited involvement of lawyers until a late stage. It is also a user-friendly reminder of the court's approach to common intention constructive trusts and the quantification of beneficial interests in a sole legal owner case.