Financial provision after overseas divorce

Jurisdiction and legislative provisions

Under MFPA 1984, Pt III spouses who have been divorced overseas, and who have a connection with England and Wales, may access the available remedies in this jurisdiction to alleviate the adverse consequences of no, or no adequate, financial provision being made by a foreign court. Mirror provisions apply in relation to dissolution of an overseas civil partnership (or its equivalent) by virtue of Schedule 7 to the Civil Partnership Act 2004 (CPA 2004).

MFPA 1984, Pt III/CPA 2004, Sch 7 provides for an application for financial relief where:

•
a marriage/civil partnership has been dissolved or annulled, or the parties have been legally separated, by means of judicial or other proceedings in an overseas country, and
•
the divorce/dissolution, annulment or legal separation is recognised as valid in England and Wales

An applicant must fulfil criteria regarding habitual residence and/or domicile. The jurisdictional provisions of the EU Maintenance Regulation—Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 are no

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Family News

Family weekly highlights—21 November 2024

This week’s edition of Family considers the interface between property law and financial remedy in the context of bankruptcy and the role of the financial dispute resolution hearing in financial remedy proceedings. Four new flowcharts setting out the steps to be taken in applications for financial provision after overseas divorce or dissolution and applications for pension sharing orders are set out, together with details of a new webinar on AI and family law.

Exceptional reasons required to bypass FDRs (GH v GH)

Family analysis: In GH v GH, Mr Justice Peel confirmed the importance of the financial dispute resolution hearing (FDR) and that bypassing this hearing to go from first appointment to final hearing is only appropriate in exceptional circumstances. This applies even where financial positions are not fully crystallised at the time of the FDR.

Family weekly highlights—14 November 2024

This week's edition of Family weekly highlights includes details of the latest Family Procedure Rule Committee meeting minutes, the President of the Family Division’s address to the British Society of Paediatric Radiologists and the Family Justice Council’s 17th annual debate. Judgments in relation to parental orders, charging orders and overseas adoption are considered. Details of a new toolkit on Scottish family law are set out.

The interface between property law and financial remedy in the context of bankruptcy (DDR v BDR)

Family analysis: This judgment shows the court adopting a highly structured approach to the determination of questions of property law prior to the determination of a financial remedy application against a backdrop of bankruptcy proceedings, procedural and evidential confusion and limited involvement of lawyers until a late stage. It is also a user-friendly reminder of the court's approach to common intention constructive trusts and the quantification of beneficial interests in a sole legal owner case.