Appeals and judicial review

General principles—appeals

In principle, every order made by a court can be subject to an appeal. Appeals need not relate to the whole of the order made, but simply to part of it, eg costs. However, an appellant cannot appeal simply because they do not agree with the order made by the court—it must either be wrong in law, or unjust due to some serious procedural or other irregularity and unmeritorious appeals can have costs implications for the unsuccessful appealing party.

A prospective appellant must seek permission to appeal in almost all cases. Permission is not required in relation to:

•
a decision of a bench of lay magistrates or a single lay justice
•
a committal order
•
a secure accommodation order
•
a refusal to grant habeas corpus for release in relation to a minor

See Practice Notes: Appeals—general principles, practice and procedure, Applications for permission to appeal in the Family Court and Appeals in public law children proceedings.

Procedure—appeals

Certain appeals from circuit judges and recorders lie to the High Court rather than the Court of Appeal with effect

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Family News

Family weekly highlights—21 November 2024

This week’s edition of Family considers the interface between property law and financial remedy in the context of bankruptcy and the role of the financial dispute resolution hearing in financial remedy proceedings. Four new flowcharts setting out the steps to be taken in applications for financial provision after overseas divorce or dissolution and applications for pension sharing orders are set out, together with details of a new webinar on AI and family law.

Exceptional reasons required to bypass FDRs (GH v GH)

Family analysis: In GH v GH, Mr Justice Peel confirmed the importance of the financial dispute resolution hearing (FDR) and that bypassing this hearing to go from first appointment to final hearing is only appropriate in exceptional circumstances. This applies even where financial positions are not fully crystallised at the time of the FDR.

Family weekly highlights—14 November 2024

This week's edition of Family weekly highlights includes details of the latest Family Procedure Rule Committee meeting minutes, the President of the Family Division’s address to the British Society of Paediatric Radiologists and the Family Justice Council’s 17th annual debate. Judgments in relation to parental orders, charging orders and overseas adoption are considered. Details of a new toolkit on Scottish family law are set out.

The interface between property law and financial remedy in the context of bankruptcy (DDR v BDR)

Family analysis: This judgment shows the court adopting a highly structured approach to the determination of questions of property law prior to the determination of a financial remedy application against a backdrop of bankruptcy proceedings, procedural and evidential confusion and limited involvement of lawyers until a late stage. It is also a user-friendly reminder of the court's approach to common intention constructive trusts and the quantification of beneficial interests in a sole legal owner case.