Q&As
Local authority duty of care in commercial stress cases
Does a local authority owe a duty of care to an individual, who has identified themselves as suffering from stress and with whom they have a commercial relationship?
The question of liability for causing psychiatric illness is a wide topic. Each case will be heavily fact dependent. This Q&A will only set out the broad Parameters of the question.
The fact that a claimant is in a contractual relationship or is a contractor of the party (such as a public Authority) whose negligence may factually be causative of his psychiatric injury does not disapply the rules which apply specially into claims for compensation for adverse psychiatric effects. Claimants in stress cases have usually been the subject of a continuous causative process and are normally considered to be primary victims.
Most cases of occupational stress are concerned with an employer's liability to an employee. In this question, it appears that the individual is not employed by the public authority but is in a 'commercial' relationship. The difference is important as all employers have a duty to take reasonable
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it,
sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.