Land contamination—technical and legal considerations involved in completing remediation work
Published by a LexisNexis Environment expert
Practice notesLand contamination—technical and legal considerations involved in completing remediation work
Published by a LexisNexis Environment expert
Practice notesThe remediation industry has undergone rapid change as a result of wide-ranging influences. UK government commitment to sustainable development, pre-Brexit European laws and an increasing understanding of the need to protect groundwater, have all played their part. Consequently, remedial solutions have become more complex, which presents increased technical and legal issues for stakeholders.
Approaches to remediation and risk
Less ‘dig and dump’ projects and more sustainable remedial solutions
Technically and legally, remediation in the 1980s and 1990s was more straightforward than it is today. Contaminated soils were often excavated and sent to inexpensive landfills and groundwater was only treated where impacts affected an abstraction. Client’s responsibility ended when the contaminated soil went into the landfill. Legal implications for the client were limited to the residual contamination around the margins of the excavation and the quality of the imported material that was used to fill the hole.
Less reliance on landfill has driven more innovative, sustainable solutions resulting in an increase in on-site treatment based solutions. If contaminated material is removed from site, it is often
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it,
sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.