IP in M&A

IP in M&A

When businesses are bought or sold, or assets reorganised within a corporate group, it is important that intellectual property (IP) issues are considered and addressed so that businesses can continue to operate normally and without disruption. In some cases IP will be critical to the operation of a business, and in others IP will play a more ancillary role. There are almost no cases where a business will not rely on any IP rights or use no material subject to IP protection in its wider operations.

IP as a business asset

IP is first and foremost a form of property, and is a key asset for many businesses. How critical a role that IP plays in the success of a business will depend both on the nature of the business and the nature of the IP. A business engaged in producing consumer products will depend heavily on trade marks and rights in passing off to protect their brand and position in the market. For some businesses their core value may come from ownership of patents giving them a monopoly over a particular inventive product or process. For other businesses,

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest IP News

IP weekly highlights—20 February 2025

This week's edition of IP weekly highlights includes: a hand-picked summary of news analysis, updates and new content from the world of IP. These highlights focus on the key rights of copyright and associated rights, database rights, trade marks and passing off, designs, and patents as well as covering issues relating to confidential information, know-how R&D and IP disputes all mainly from a UK and European perspective.

European Commission issues guidelines on the definition of AI systems

EU Law analysis: The European Commission has issued long awaited comprehensive guidelines on the definition of AI systems, as established by Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (EU AI Act). With these practical guidelines, the Commission aims to assist providers, deployers, importers, distributors of AI systems in determining whether a system constitutes an AI system within the meaning of the EU AI Act, thereby facilitating the effective application and enforcement of that Act. The definition of AI systems entered into force on 2 February 2025. Dóra Petrányi, Central Eastern Europe managing director and co-head of the Technology, Media and Communications Group, Katalin Horváth and Ian Stevens, partners at CMS, analyse the key elements of the AI system definition.

EPO launches public consultation on 2026-2027 work plan

The European Patent Office (EPO) has initiated a public consultation to gather input for its Observatory on Patents and Technology's work plan for 2026 and 2027. The plan aims to align with Europe's transformation priorities and address current challenges in innovation. This consultation, open until 17 March, invites stakeholders, including policymakers, researchers, and the public, to help shape the Observatory's future initiatives.

Did the EU General Court exceed its jurisdiction in its review of an EUIPO Board of Appeal decision? (EUIPO v Neoperl AG)

IP analysis: In a trade mark case regarding the registrability of a tactile trade mark filed at the EUIPO by Neoperl AG, an appeal against a decision of the EUIPO Board of Appeal was heard before the EU General Court. The General Court, on reviewing the Board of Appeal decision, decided that the provisions of Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) 207/2009 should be applied to the matter in order such that an analysis of the trade mark under Article 7(1)(a), which in conjunction with Article 4 determines what signs are capable of functioning as trade marks, had to be made before the court could look at the application of Article 7(1)(b), which prevents registration of trade marks that lack distinctive character. The EUIPO appealed the decision to the Court of Justice, which held that the General Court was wrong to apply an order of precedence to subsections of Article 7 of Regulation 207/2009 and was wrong to make a decision on an issue that was not first examined by the EUIPO Board of Appeal. Written by Helene Whelbourn, legal director at Lee & Thompson LLP.