It’s in the drafting—two recent UK cases show how collaboration agreements and employee arrangements with individuals involved in R&D can come unstuck
IP analysis: Two recent decisions of the Courts of England & Wales demonstrate the difficulties encountered in determining ownership of innovation and illustrate the importance of clearly reflecting the intention of the parties in drafting collaboration agreements and service agreements with R&D individuals/employees. The first (Bionome v Clearwater) involved the determination of the construction of a collaboration agreement, and the second (Hill v Touchlight) a situation where the inventor was transferring from being an independent contractor to an employee and the point in that timeline at which the invention was created, and the implications for the ownership of that invention flowing from this. Jonathan Turnbull, partner, Kate Peck, associate, and Eren Ozenir, graduate solicitor, at Herbert Smith Freehills discuss the key takeaways from the judgments.