Home / Insurance & Reinsurance / Key developments / Weekly highlights

Legal News

Insurance & Reinsurance weekly highlights—5 May 2022

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

Published on: 05 May 2022

Published by a LexisNexis Insurance & Reinsurance expert

Table of contents

Ukraine conflict—insurance & reinsurance implications
Cases and decisions
Insurance distribution (Slater & Gordon UK Ltd v Edwards)
Market practice
FCA staff strike
Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)
Types of insurance
Cyber
Property insurance
Professional indemnity

More sections of this document available when you sign-in to Lexis+ or register for a free trial.

Article summary

This week's edition of Insurance & Reinsurance weekly highlights includes: updates relating to the Ukraine conflict, cases and decisions, market practice, regulatory developments, dates for your diary and other news highlights reported over the past week.

Popular documents

Insurer cannot move £4m coronavirus (COVID-19) dispute out of court (DC Bars Ltd v QIC Europe Ltd)

Law360, London: A London judge has rejected an insurer’s bid to force a UK restaurant and bar operator's claim for coronavirus (COVID-19) business interruption cover into arbitration, ruling the insurer must address the claim in court because it is disputing its liability.

Micklefield clauses

Micklefield clausesWhat is a Micklefield clause?It is common for employee share plans to provide that, on termination of employment (or when an employee is given or receives notice of termination of employment), subsisting share awards will be forfeited and subsisting share options will lapse.It is

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a

Brussels I (recast)—domicile (Arts 4 and 63) [Archived]

Brussels I (recast)—domicile (Arts 4 and 63) [Archived]ARCHIVED: This Practice Note has been archived and is not maintained.This Practice Note considers the general rule set out in Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 1215/2012, Brussels I (recast) when determining the relevance of a defendant’s domicile to