Costs and charges

Costs and charges

Since 2012, increasing attention has been given to the charges borne by members of work-based pension schemes, both in terms of the nature and level of these charges. This arose out of a concern that members of defined contribution (DC) schemes, especially work-based schemes which are subject to auto-enrolment requirements, were not getting value for money from their pension investment.

There are now various restrictions applicable to charges borne by members in occupational pension schemes and workplace personal pension schemes.

Restrictions on member-borne commissions

Member-borne commissions are arrangements whereby the service provider remunerates a pension adviser for advice or services provided to members or an employer and recoups this cost by imposing increased charges on members' pension pots.

The drive to restrict such commissions started on 31 December 2012 with the Retail Distribution Review (RDR), which resulted in pension providers of new group personal pension schemes, group stakeholder schemes and group self-invested personal pension being banned from paying commission to advisers.

For further information, see Practice Note: The Retail Distribution Review and pensions [Archived].

On 6 April 2016, the ban was extended to apply to:

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Pensions News

Releasing surplus in winding up (Arcadia Group Pension Trust Ltd v Smith)

Pensions analysis: Master Marsh (sitting in retirement) approved the merger of two Arcadia Group pensions schemes, both of which were in winding-up following the principal employer’s entry into administration and then liquidation. Because the proposed exercise of the amendment power enabling the merger was at a time that the schemes were in winding up, it was a momentous decision requiring the courts approval. The Master was satisfied that the amendment power was sufficiently wide to enable it to be exercised. Insofar as the deed made express provision for the exercise of the power during winding up, there was no scope to imply any fetter on the proposed exercise in this case. Furthermore, the merger constituted a proper exercise of the power, ascertained by reference to the purpose of the scheme, even though adding members of the Executive Scheme to the Staff Scheme would apportion Staff Scheme surplus to Executive Scheme members. Written by Dr Charlotte Elves, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers.

PLSA responds to FRC's UK Stewardship Code Consultation

The Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association (PLSA) has submitted a response to the Financial Reporting Council's (FRC) consultation on proposed revisions to the UK Stewardship Code. While welcoming efforts to streamline reporting requirements, the PLSA expresses concerns about the proposed new definition of stewardship, which omits explicit references to 'environment' and 'society'. The PLSA argues that this change risks diluting stewardship standards at a time when environmental and social considerations are increasingly important. The PLSA emphasises the voluntary nature of the Code and its role as a beacon of best practice, urging the FRC to maintain robust stewardship standards in line with the government's commitment to sustainable finance and the green transition.

TPR improves oversight of largest DC schemes to enhance member outcomes

The Pensions Regulator (TPR) has announced improvements in its supervision of master trusts and defined contribution (DC) schemes, following a 12-month review. TPR’s new approach splits schemes into four segments of supervision with tailored levels of engagement, aiming to identify risks sooner and improve saver outcomes. These segments include, monoline, commercial and non-commercial master trusts, collective DC schemes as well as single and connected employer DC schemes. TPR’s key focuses include ensuring that all savers receive value for money and establishing clear priorities around investments, data quality, and innovation at retirement. For larger schemes, dedicated multi-disciplinary teams will be assigned, facilitating more targeted, expert-level interactions. This shift represents a move towards a more prudential regulatory style, addressing both scheme-specific and market-wide risks in the UK pensions landscape.