Insolvency and pensions

What happens to the assets in a pension scheme on a company insolvency?

On a company’s insolvency, the funds in its pension scheme do not automatically form part of the assets of the company. They are not automatically available to pay the company’s creditors unless an office-holder has an action against the scheme for the return of funds, eg if a preference transaction has occurred.

An insolvency practitioner appointed over the company must give notice of the insolvency to the Pensions Regulator (TPR), the Pension Protection Fund (PPF) and the trustees or managers of the pension scheme (see Pensions Act 2004, s 120). For further information, see Practice Note: What happens to a pension scheme on a company’s insolvency?

What if there are employer or employee contribution arrears at the insolvency date?

Employee contributions

If the insolvent employer has deducted contributions to a DB or DC scheme from an employee’s pay in the four months before its insolvency, but failed to pay them to the scheme, the amount of the unpaid contributions will be a preferential debt in the employer’s insolvency (Schedule 4 to the To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Pensions News

PASA responds to HMRC's consultation on IHT for pensions

The Pensions Administration Standards Association (PASA) has responded to HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) technical consultation on Inheritance Tax (IHT) for pensions. PASA argues that the new approach introduces unnecessary complexity and imposes inequitable burdens on Pension Scheme Administrators (PSAs). PASA contends that the suggested proposals could lead to unfavourable results for savers and their beneficiaries due to heightened operational and financial effects. Key issues highlighted in PASA’s response include inadequate consideration of PSA requirements, unrealistic timescales, disproportionate administrative and financial burdens, and potential negative impacts on savers and beneficiaries. PASA recommends the following:

FCA responds to UK Government’s call for regulators to support economic growth

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has responded to the UK Government's call for regulators to support economic growth by outlining significant ongoing efforts and future plans. Key initiatives include reforming wholesale markets with a new prospectus regime, easing retail access to corporate bonds, allowing private companies to enter the market, improving saver investment, reducing conduct requirements for wholesale insurers, streamlining asset management regulations, launching a consolidated tape for fixed income data accessibility, and expediting capital requirements examination for specialised trading firms to improve liquidity. These measures aim to streamline regulations, improve saver access, streamline asset management, and enhance liquidity.

Local government pension reform puts £400bn at risk, funds warn

Law360: The government's plans to consolidate public sector pension schemes could set off a chain of unintended consequences that could jeopardise up to £400bn in assets, fund managers warned on 16 January 2025.

PLSA supports Mansion House reform aims while highlighting implementation concerns

The Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association (PLSA) has responded to government consultations on Mansion House reforms affecting defined contribution (DC) schemes and the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS). While supporting the overall objectives of fostering economic growth and improving outcomes for savers, the PLSA warns of potential implementation issues and unintended consequences. For DC schemes, the PLSA expresses concern that the proposed scale test may not achieve the goal of increasing UK productive asset investment and could disrupt the market. Regarding LGPS reforms, the PLSA supports funds setting local investment targets and enhancing governance but cautions against changes to strategic asset allocation responsibilities. The association also advocates for a pragmatic approach to compliance timelines for both sets of reforms.