Pensions allowances

Annual allowance

The annual allowance is the maximum amount by which the value of an individual's pension savings across all the registered pension schemes of which they are a member may increase in any year without tax penalties arising. The annual allowance charge is levied where the annual allowance is exceeded. The amount of the annual allowance has changed over time and is set by order from the Treasury. It is also possible to carry forward unused annual allowance from the previous three tax years.

Unlike other types of allowances, considerations relating to the annual allowance are relevant at the point funds are paid into the registered pension scheme.

If the annual amount saved under the registered pension schemes by or on behalf of an individual exceeds the annual allowance, a tax charge known as the annual allowance charge will arise. An annual allowance charge may, in certain circumstances, be paid by the scheme through a system known as Scheme Pays.

For further information, see Practice Notes: The annual allowance and Using Scheme Pays to pay the annual allowance charge.

The lump sum allowance and lump sum and

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Pensions News

Pensions Ombudsman orders former director of trustee company to pay £9.7m to two pension schemes (Dalriada Trustees (PO-16266))

Pensions analysis: The Pensions Ombudsman (PO) has upheld a complaint brought by Dalriada Trustees Ltd (Dalriada) and others of multiple instances of breach of trust and maladministration against Ecroignard Trustees Ltd (Ecroignard) and a Mr Shroff, a former director of that company. Ecroignard has been wound up—although its ultimate dissolution has been suspended until 2028. Written by Paul Carney, a partner at Shoosmiths LLP.

PPF responds to Work and Pensions committee regarding the indexation of compensation relating to pre-1997 benefits

The Pension Protection Fund (PPF) has responded to the Work and Pensions Committee letter dated 17 December 2024 regarding the impact of increasing PPF and Financial Assistance Scheme (FAS) payments. PPF’s response includes revised figures detailing the potential impact of indexing pre-97 compensation for PPF members and FAS payments. The updated calculations, based on the 2023/24 annual report and accounts, encompass various scenarios including prospective and retrospective changes to indexation, removal of the 90% factor for deferred members, and alterations to FAS assistance increases. The PPF emphasises that the cost implications are sensitive to market conditions, particularly nominal yields. The data presented includes comprehensive breakdowns of the effects on PPF assets, liabilities, funding levels, and reserves under different indexation scenarios, providing a nuanced view of the financial implications of potential policy changes.

PSIG announces consultation outcomes and future plans

The Pension Scams Industry Group (PSIG) has revealed the results of its recent consultation, ‘Evolution or Extinction’ which sought to determine the organisation's future direction. The feedback indicates strong industry support for PSIG's work, particularly its Code of Good Practice. Respondents called for more proactive measures, including increased lobbying efforts, an interactive information hub, and expanded services such as training and accreditation schemes. However, despite the demand for enhanced services, the industry has not committed to providing funding for PSIG's operations. Looking ahead to 2025, PSIG plans to publish an updated Code of Good Practice, maintain its involvement with the Pension Scams Action Group, and continue offering the Pension Scams Industry Forum. The group will review its options and present a proposal for future operations later in the year.

Government ignores calls for redress over women’s state pension age failings

Law360: The Labour government announced on 17 December 2024 that it will not compensate women affected by historical failures to inform them that their state retirement age had changed, in a move campaigners called an 'unprecedented political choice' set to have long-term repercussions.