Joint ventures and reorganisations

Joint ventures

The term 'joint venture' (JV) has no specific legal meaning under UK law. It is essentially a commercial arrangement between two or more parties who agree to pool their resources for the purpose of accomplishing an intended project (or other business activity). The JV vehicle can, for example, take the form of a limited liability company where each party is a shareholder.

The establishment of a JV between two or more sponsoring parties will require the parties to the JV to identify the various pensions issues arising from setting up such a vehicle.

Establishing pension provision for its employees

Pensions issues that arise include:

•
identifying what pension rights existing employees of the JV vehicle already have on the commencement of their employment
•
identifying how the JV vehicle will actually acquire the employees, eg, will they be new hires or will they transfer to the new employer in accordance with the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (TUPE)?
•
clarifying what pension provision the JV vehicle is legally obliged to provide its employees. These requirements can vary depending on whether the employees

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Pensions News

Releasing surplus in winding up (Arcadia Group Pension Trust Ltd v Smith)

Pensions analysis: Master Marsh (sitting in retirement) approved the merger of two Arcadia Group pensions schemes, both of which were in winding-up following the principal employer’s entry into administration and then liquidation. Because the proposed exercise of the amendment power enabling the merger was at a time that the schemes were in winding up, it was a momentous decision requiring the courts approval. The Master was satisfied that the amendment power was sufficiently wide to enable it to be exercised. Insofar as the deed made express provision for the exercise of the power during winding up, there was no scope to imply any fetter on the proposed exercise in this case. Furthermore, the merger constituted a proper exercise of the power, ascertained by reference to the purpose of the scheme, even though adding members of the Executive Scheme to the Staff Scheme would apportion Staff Scheme surplus to Executive Scheme members. Written by Dr Charlotte Elves, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers.

PLSA responds to FRC's UK Stewardship Code Consultation

The Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association (PLSA) has submitted a response to the Financial Reporting Council's (FRC) consultation on proposed revisions to the UK Stewardship Code. While welcoming efforts to streamline reporting requirements, the PLSA expresses concerns about the proposed new definition of stewardship, which omits explicit references to 'environment' and 'society'. The PLSA argues that this change risks diluting stewardship standards at a time when environmental and social considerations are increasingly important. The PLSA emphasises the voluntary nature of the Code and its role as a beacon of best practice, urging the FRC to maintain robust stewardship standards in line with the government's commitment to sustainable finance and the green transition.

TPR improves oversight of largest DC schemes to enhance member outcomes

The Pensions Regulator (TPR) has announced improvements in its supervision of master trusts and defined contribution (DC) schemes, following a 12-month review. TPR’s new approach splits schemes into four segments of supervision with tailored levels of engagement, aiming to identify risks sooner and improve saver outcomes. These segments include, monoline, commercial and non-commercial master trusts, collective DC schemes as well as single and connected employer DC schemes. TPR’s key focuses include ensuring that all savers receive value for money and establishing clear priorities around investments, data quality, and innovation at retirement. For larger schemes, dedicated multi-disciplinary teams will be assigned, facilitating more targeted, expert-level interactions. This shift represents a move towards a more prudential regulatory style, addressing both scheme-specific and market-wide risks in the UK pensions landscape.