Trustees

Trustees

Trusts are often used by employers as the legal framework for establishing pension schemes to provide benefits for their employees on retirement and death. The main reason is to provide security for members' benefits: under a trust, the scheme assets are separate from the assets of the sponsoring employer and can only be returned to the employer in limited circumstances (eg if there is a surplus of scheme funds).

The scheme's governing documentation, in the form of its trust deed and rules, contains the terms of the trust. When a scheme is established, trustees are appointed to operate the trust in accordance with its trust deed and rules.

Trustee structures

Trustees can be individuals acting in a personal capacity or companies set up for the specific purpose of acting as trustee. Where a company acts as trustee, the directors of the company effectively carry out the company's trustee functions on its behalf.

In general, a scheme will be run by a group of individual trustees or by a company as sole trustee. However, it is also becoming more common for professional, independent trustee companies to be appointed alongside

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Pensions News

Releasing surplus in winding up (Arcadia Group Pension Trust Ltd v Smith)

Pensions analysis: Master Marsh (sitting in retirement) approved the merger of two Arcadia Group pensions schemes, both of which were in winding-up following the principal employer’s entry into administration and then liquidation. Because the proposed exercise of the amendment power enabling the merger was at a time that the schemes were in winding up, it was a momentous decision requiring the courts approval. The Master was satisfied that the amendment power was sufficiently wide to enable it to be exercised. Insofar as the deed made express provision for the exercise of the power during winding up, there was no scope to imply any fetter on the proposed exercise in this case. Furthermore, the merger constituted a proper exercise of the power, ascertained by reference to the purpose of the scheme, even though adding members of the Executive Scheme to the Staff Scheme would apportion Staff Scheme surplus to Executive Scheme members. Written by Dr Charlotte Elves, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers.

PLSA responds to FRC's UK Stewardship Code Consultation

The Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association (PLSA) has submitted a response to the Financial Reporting Council's (FRC) consultation on proposed revisions to the UK Stewardship Code. While welcoming efforts to streamline reporting requirements, the PLSA expresses concerns about the proposed new definition of stewardship, which omits explicit references to 'environment' and 'society'. The PLSA argues that this change risks diluting stewardship standards at a time when environmental and social considerations are increasingly important. The PLSA emphasises the voluntary nature of the Code and its role as a beacon of best practice, urging the FRC to maintain robust stewardship standards in line with the government's commitment to sustainable finance and the green transition.

TPR improves oversight of largest DC schemes to enhance member outcomes

The Pensions Regulator (TPR) has announced improvements in its supervision of master trusts and defined contribution (DC) schemes, following a 12-month review. TPR’s new approach splits schemes into four segments of supervision with tailored levels of engagement, aiming to identify risks sooner and improve saver outcomes. These segments include, monoline, commercial and non-commercial master trusts, collective DC schemes as well as single and connected employer DC schemes. TPR’s key focuses include ensuring that all savers receive value for money and establishing clear priorities around investments, data quality, and innovation at retirement. For larger schemes, dedicated multi-disciplinary teams will be assigned, facilitating more targeted, expert-level interactions. This shift represents a move towards a more prudential regulatory style, addressing both scheme-specific and market-wide risks in the UK pensions landscape.