Covert recordings of neuropsychological testing (Celikdemir v PGR Timber Ltd)
PI & Clinical Negligence analysis: In a personal injury claim, the court was faced with an application by the claimant to rely on a covert recording of the neuropsychological testing administered by the defendant’s expert and a subsequent report produced by the claimant’s expert critiquing the defendant’s expert’s approach. After considering the relevant legal principles, including the earlier case of Mustard v Flower & Ord as well as the factual issues weighing on either side of the balance in the present case, His Honour Judge Shanks (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) decided to admit the evidence. This case is therefore a further endorsement, albeit somewhat reluctantly, of covert recordings of medical expert assessments, which is now becoming common practice in personal injury litigation. Written by Peter Hale, barrister at 12 King's Bench Walk