Court of Appeal considers the English Court ‘clearly and distinctly the appropriate forum’ to hear trafficking and forced labour claims (Limbu v Dyson)
Dispute Resolution analysis: The Court of Appeal has held that the English Court was ‘clearly and distinctly the appropriate forum’ to hear a number of claims against Dyson, relating to alleged trafficking, forced labour, exploitative and abusive working and living conditions, and in some cases, detention, torture and beating whilst the claimants were manufacturing components in Dyson’s supply chain. The first two defendants were English companies served, as of right, in England, and the third defendant was a company domiciled in Malaysia, permission for service out having been granted on the basis of it being a proper and necessary party. At first instance, it was held that Malaysia was the appropriate forum and that there was no real risk that the ‘very poor’ claimants would be unable to access justice there. The Court of Appeal overturned the first instance decision and exercised its own evaluation of the Spiliada factors. Written by Georgia Whiting, legal counsel at Ardmore Construction Group.