News 4
ET3 Response to claim—disability discrimination (direct discrimination, indirect discrimination, discrimination arising from disability and failure to make reasonable adjustments), harassment, victimisation and unfair dismissal (ill-health capability)
Published by a LexisNexis Employment expert
PrecedentsET3 Response to claim—disability discrimination (direct discrimination, indirect discrimination, discrimination arising from disability and failure to make reasonable adjustments), harassment, victimisation and unfair dismissal (ill-health capability)
Published by a LexisNexis Employment expert
Precedents[Insert in para 6.1 of response form ET3:]
1
It is [accepted OR denied] that the Claimant was employed by the Respondent as a [insert claimed job title, eg a trainee solicitor] from [insert start date of employment] until [his OR her OR their] dismissal on [insert end date of employment]. It is [accepted OR denied] that the Respondent is [insert brief description of the nature of the Respondent, eg an international law firm].
2
The Respondent denies that the Claimant was [insert details of claims made, eg discriminated against, harassed, victimised or unfairly dismissed], as alleged or at all.
[Jurisdiction]
[Insert details of any jurisdictional defences that the respondent wishes to argue. Example text is provided at paragraph 3 below.]
3
[Other than the complaints about the dismissal and the alleged reference requests, all other acts complained of have been presented outside the statutory three-month time limit and the employment tribunal has no jurisdiction to consider them.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it,
sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.
Related documents:
- A suggested four-stage test to apply when considering an Acas uplift ((1) Slade, (2) Hamilton v (1)...
- Burden of proof is on claimant initially in discrimination claims (Ayodele v Citylink)
- Claimant does not carry an initial burden of proof in claims under the Equality Act 2010 (Efobi v Ro...
- The untold cost of equal pay claims—BNP Paribas ordered to publish salaries, bonuses and pension con...
Practice notes 4
Precedents 4