Rent

Rent

Rent is not required for a tenancy to exist, although it is a strong indicator that the parties intended to create a tenancy. If the other ‘hallmarks’ identified in Street v Mountford are present (ie exclusive possession of defined premises for a term), then a tenancy can exist even if no rent is reserved or payable.

The amount of rent must be ‘certain’. This does not mean that the lease must state the actual figures for the whole of the term, however, there must be a mechanism (usually a rent review clause) allowing the rent throughout the term to be ascertained with certainty.

No particular form of words is required to reserve rent, although the formula ‘yielding and paying during the term’ is widely used.

Commercial rents are usually paid in advance by equal instalments on the quarter days (25 December, 25 March, 24 June and 29 September) or on other dates specified as rent payment days. In the absence of an express agreement that rent is payable in advance, it will be payable in arrears.

Where rent is payable quarterly in advance, the whole

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Property Disputes News

MHCLG announces leasehold reforms for 2025 – implementation of LFRA 2024 and modernisation of commonhold

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government has announced a comprehensive set of leasehold reforms, scheduled for implementation in 2025, aimed at providing increased rights and protections for owners of five million leasehold homes. Key measures include the implementation of the provisions in the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 (LFRA 2024) in January 2025, which remove the current ‘two-year-rule’, enabling leaseholders to extend their lease or purchase their freehold without waiting two years after their initial purchase and those which will allow homeowners to take over the management of their building, and ensure more cost transparency and facilitating challenges to unfair service charges.

Property Disputes weekly highlights—21 November 2024

This week's edition of Property Disputes weekly highlights includes: a Court of Appeal case on the court’s jurisdiction to vary a suspended possession order, Upper Tribunal decisions on the impact on limitation of non-payment of an application fee, and the reasonable repair assumption in determining rateable value, and a High Court case regarding adverse possession and trespass. It also includes the launch of the Law Commission’s consultation on the right to renew business tenancies under Part 2 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, as well as the UK Judiciary’s release of the Senior President of Tribunals’ annual report for 2024.

175th Practice Direction update—in force 20 November 2024

The Master of the Rolls and the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice have approved the 175th Practice Direction (PD) update to the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR). The amendments come into force on 20 November 2024. The 175th PD update contains amendments to the online Damages Claims Pilot under CPR PD 51ZB (the DCP), in order to correct a misalignment between the rules in CPR PD 51ZB and the operation of the DCP digital service, concerning the automatic dismissal of claims. CPR PD 51ZB is updated to state so that within four months of the date of issue of the claim, the claimant must not only notify the defendant of the claim and the claim details, but also notify the DCP that they have taken these steps to avoid automatic dismissal of the claim.

Law Commission launches consultation on right to renew business tenancies

The Law Commission has launched a consultation to examine how the right to renew business tenancies under Part 2 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (LTA 1954) functions and whether it meets the needs of business tenants and landlords. The consultation seeks to assess the efficacy of the current ‘contracting out’ model and explore alternative models, including mandatory security, the abolition of security of tenure, and a ‘contracting-in’ approach. It also examines which types of business tenancies should benefit from security of tenure. The consultation closes on 19 February 2025, with a second consultation paper expected to follow based on the responses received.

View Property Disputes by content type :

News