Restrictive covenants

Copyright © 2024 LexisNexis

A restrictive covenant requires the covenantor not to do something, whether that is building or using the land for particular purposes. Unlike 'positive' covenants, the burden of a restrictive covenant is capable of 'running with the land', so that successive owners or occupiers are bound by the restriction.

Covenants restricting the use of land imposed by a seller may be divided into three classes:

  1. •

    covenants imposed for the seller’s own benefit

  2. •

    covenants imposed as owner of other land, of which the land sold formed a part, and intended to protect or benefit the unsold land

  3. •

    covenants on a sale of land to various buyers who, with their respective successors in title, are intended mutually to enjoy the benefit of, and be bound by, the covenants

The first category of covenants is personal to the seller and only enforceable by them, unless expressly assigned.

The second category ‘run’ with the land and are enforceable without express assignment by the owner for the time being of the land for the benefit of which they were imposed.

The third category is most usually

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Property Disputes News

RICS announces updated Red Book Global Valuation Standards

The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) has announced significant updates to its Valuation - Global Standards, known as the Red Book. The new edition, set to take effect on 31 January 2025, includes key upgrades such as: alignment with the latest International Valuation Standards; significant adaptations for fast developing areas such as technology and Environmental Social and Governance considerations; integration of new data on modelling and methods and a reformed format for Valuation Technical and Performance Standards.

MHCLG publishes Remediation Acceleration Plan to address unsafe cladding

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) has published a new Remediation Acceleration Plan (RAP), aimed at expediting the removal of unsafe cladding in England, identifying all unsafe buildings, and supporting residents from the financial burdens of remediation. The plan sets key targets for 2029, including remediating all 18m+ buildings with unsafe cladding in government-funded schemes by 2029, and ensuring all 11m+ buildings are either remediated, have a completion date, or landlords face severe penalties. The RAP is supported by increased enforcement investment, which will increase the capacity of local authorities, fire and rescue authorities and the Building Safety Regulator (BSR) to manage hundreds of cases annually. The publication of the RAP coincides with a Parliamentary debate on the findings of the Grenfell Tower Inquiry’s final report. During the debate, it was announced that a continuous review process for statutory guidance to building regulations will be introduced, covering fire safety and building design by the BSR. In addition, there will be a review of how the Building Regulations guidance is produced, updated, and communicated to the construction industry.

MHCLG consults on permitted insurance fees for landlords and freeholders

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) has launched a consultation, seeking views on introducing permitted insurance fees for landlords, freeholders, and property managing agents, pursuant to measures in the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024, which addresses concerns over opaque and excessive charges imposed on leaseholders for building insurance. The proposals suggest replacing the current commission-based remuneration system with a transparent fee structure that reflects the work involved in arranging and managing building insurance. The consultation seeks views on the activities to be covered by the permitted fee, how it should be calculated, and additional criteria to ensure fairness and proportionality. The responses received will inform secondary legislation that will define the parameters of the permitted fee. The consultation closes on 24 February 2025.

Property Disputes weekly highlights—28 November 2024

This week's edition of Property Disputes weekly highlights includes: a Court of Appeal decision on adverse possession and first registration, High Court decisions on the balance that must be struck between the rights to freedom of speech and assembly versus the prevention of trespass on private property, and beneficial ownership of a long leasehold restaurant property, and an Upper Tribunal decision on whether the First-tier Tribunal correctly decided to imply a legal obligations compliance term into a headlease. It also includes the approval of the 175th and 176th Practice Direction Updates to the Civil Procedure Rules, the publication of the minutes of the meeting of the King’s Bench Masters’ Court Users’ Group, the Civil Justice Council’s second phase report on the Pre-Action Protocols, the launch of the UK Supreme Court’s new digital platform and the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government’s announcement of leasehold reforms for 2025, and publication of its impact assessment on the Renters’ Rights Bill.

View Property Disputes by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

A person has a right of way to access their property both with vehicles and on foot over an unadopted

A person has a right of way to access their property both with vehicles and on foot over an unadopted road. The right of way has been obstructed by a neighbour who parks their vehicle across the entrance to the road. The neighbour's property is unregistered and has no right of way over the road. No

Remedies for breach of restrictive covenants

Remedies for breach of restrictive covenantsThis Practice Note explains when damages might be awarded in lieu of an injunction, how damages are assessed and what happens if the beneficiary delays in claiming for the breach.Damages or injunction—the testThe primary remedy for breach of a restrictive

There is a restrictive covenant noted on a registered title, and the covenant was created in 1966 before

There is a restrictive covenant noted on a registered title, and the covenant was created in 1966 before registration of the land in 1980. If a land charges search reveals that the covenant is not registered as a class D(ii) land charge against the original covenantor, does that mean it should never

If a lease excludes section 62 of the Law of Property Act 1925, does this prevent a leaseholder from

If a lease excludes section 62 of the Law of Property Act 1925, does this prevent a leaseholder from acquiring a right to light?The benefit of a right to light already acquired by the landlord at the date of grant of the lease (or in the process of being acquired by the landlord) can be passed to a
A person has a right of way to access their property both with vehicles and on foot over an unadopted

A person has a right of way to access their property both with vehicles and on foot over an unadopted

A person has a right of way to access their property both with vehicles and on foot over an unadopted road. The right of way has been obstructed by a neighbour who parks their vehicle across the entrance to the road. The neighbour's property is unregistered and has no right of way over the road. No

Remedies for breach of restrictive covenants

Remedies for breach of restrictive covenants

Remedies for breach of restrictive covenantsThis Practice Note explains when damages might be awarded in lieu of an injunction, how damages are assessed and what happens if the beneficiary delays in claiming for the breach.Damages or injunction—the testThe primary remedy for breach of a restrictive

There is a restrictive covenant noted on a registered title, and the covenant was created in 1966 before

There is a restrictive covenant noted on a registered title, and the covenant was created in 1966 before

There is a restrictive covenant noted on a registered title, and the covenant was created in 1966 before registration of the land in 1980. If a land charges search reveals that the covenant is not registered as a class D(ii) land charge against the original covenantor, does that mean it should never

If a lease excludes section 62 of the Law of Property Act 1925, does this prevent a leaseholder from

If a lease excludes section 62 of the Law of Property Act 1925, does this prevent a leaseholder from

If a lease excludes section 62 of the Law of Property Act 1925, does this prevent a leaseholder from acquiring a right to light?The benefit of a right to light already acquired by the landlord at the date of grant of the lease (or in the process of being acquired by the landlord) can be passed to a