Environmental information regulation

Access to information is a critical component of a modern democracy. Ensuring that individuals, communities, businesses and other organisations have the opportunity to request and receive public documents is essential for effective participation in public life and it helps to make government and governance more efficient, open and transparent. The right to receive and impart information subject to appropriate exceptions is found in the Article 10 right under the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950: Freedom of Expression.

The right of access to environmental information is a key international norm found for instance, in Principle 10 of the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development 1992 which provides that:

‘Environmental issues are best handled with the participation of all concerned citizens, at the relevant level. At the national level, each individual shall have appropriate access to information concerning the environment that is held by public authorities, including information on hazardous materials and activities in their communities, and the opportunity to participate in decision-making processes. States shall facilitate and encourage public awareness and participation by making information widely available. Effective access to judicial and administrative proceedings, including

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Public Law News

UK Parliament establishes new Northern Ireland scrutiny committee

The UK Parliament has appointed a new Northern Ireland Scrutiny Committee, effective 30 January 2025, following a recommendation by the Liaison Committee. This body succeeds the previous Windsor Framework Sub-Committee and is tasked with scrutinising EU legislation within the scope of the Protocol/Windsor Framework, as well as relevant UK legislation and policy. Chaired by Lord Carlile of Berriew, the 12-member committee comprises representatives from various political parties and affiliations. The committee's primary objectives include providing clarity on the Windsor Framework and examining its impact on Northern Ireland's economy, social, and political landscape, thus continuing the essential scrutiny work initiated by its predecessor.

Public law defences in winding up petitions under section 85 of the Finance Act 2022 (Re Purity Ltd)

Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: HMRC sought the winding up of a company on grounds of public interest under section 85 of the Finance Act 2022 (FA 2022). The petition was listed for trial. The company had, after presentation of the petition, made a judicial review application challenging HMRC’s decision to present the petition. It then applied for a stay of the winding up proceedings. This was on the basis that it could not rely on public law defences at the trial of the petition, since those could only properly be dealt with by the Administrative Court. It was held that petitions under FA 2022, s 85 should be treated similarly to public interest petitions under section 124 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986), and that there was no restriction on what defences the company could advance. Therefore, it was not appropriate to grant a stay. Written by Nora Wannagat, barrister at Tanfield Chambers.

Contracting authority successfully lifts automatic suspension once again (One Medicare v NHS Northamptonshire ICB)

Public Law analysis: This case involved a successful application by a contracting authority under the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (PCR), reg 96(1)(a) to lift the automatic suspension imposed by regulation 95 of the PCR. It provides further clarity on the test to lift the automatic suspension and the difficulties faced by those opposing such an application. As is usually the case in such an application, the contracting authority accepted (for the purposes of the application) that there was a serious issue to be tried such that the case centered on the delicate balance between the adequacy of damages and the balance of convenience. Mrs Justice Jefford, albeit with some hesitation, acknowledged that lifting the suspension could potentially disrupt the claimant’s business in ways that damages could not adequately compensate. However, compelling factors strongly favored lifting the suspension, highlighting the significant evidentiary burden on claimants and the challenges they face when contesting an application to lift the automatic suspension, particularly in cases involving essential public services. The case also highlights the importance of a cross undertaking in damages when it comes to applications to lift the automatic suspension. Written by Sam Pringle, senior associate and Gabriella Rasiah, trainee solicitor at DWF Law LLP.

The practical implications of the designation of data centres as critical national infrastructure

Information law analysis: In September 2024 the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology announced new plans to boost data centres and protect them from cyber threats and power outages, designating data centres as Critical National Infrastructure (CNI) alongside key facilities such as energy and water systems. Adam Richardson, Barrister, 4-5 Gray’s Inn Square discusses the background to this designation and its implications.