International recognition and enforcement of judgments

Copyright © 2024 LexisNexis

Overview Content for select subtopic is not present

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Restructuring & Insolvency News

Insolvency Service forces fraudulent online pet supply company to cease all operations

The Insolvency Services has reported the shut down of Funnyfuzzy UK Co.Ltd for providing its customers with inferior and defective pet supplies. Following the Insolvency Service's investigation, it was revealed that the company had been misleading its customers by providing them with second-rate merchandise; failing to deliver ordered items; and refusing to issue refunds while lodging fabricated dormant accounts and evading VAT registration.

Directors’ liability for company’s debts under section 217 of the Insolvency Act 1986 and rule 22.17 of the Insolvency Rules 2016 (Maxima v Fealy and Barrett)

Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: The High Court has dismissed a claim brought by an assignee of creditors' debts against individuals who were directors of a company in liquidation and a second company which was operating under a prohibited name pursuant to section 216 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986). The defendants successfully argued that the second company fell within ‘The Third Excepted Case’ under the Insolvency Rules 2016 (IR 2016), SI 2016/1024, r 22.7, and that the second company had been known by its name for the entire 12 months prior to the first company's liquidation and had not at any time in those 12 months been dormant. The case is thought to be the only reported case on the true meaning and effect of the second of the two elements of The Third Excepted Case and demonstrates that the principles of corporate accounting law on non-dormancy cannot be translated from an accounting to an insolvency scenario. The concept of phoenix syndrome and the principle against doubtful penalisation were also considered. Written by Laura Newbery, legal director at Addleshaw Goddard LLP.

Top UK court rejects Bedzhamov Russian bankruptcy order

Law360, London: The UK Supreme Court refused on 20 November 2024 to recognise a Russian bankruptcy order against two properties owned by banker Georgy Ivanovich Bedzhamov in Britain, confirming a legal principle that foreign courts do not have jurisdiction over English land.

Restructuring & Insolvency weekly highlights—21 November 2024

This week's edition of Restructuring & Insolvency weekly highlights includes: confirmation by the Supreme Court of the immovables rule to English property (Kireeva v Bedzhamov), the publication by the Insolvency Service of its monthly insolvency statistics for October 2024, an analysis on the interface between property law and financial remedy in the context of bankruptcy (DDR v BDR), plus a round-up of other news and cases for restructuring and insolvency professionals.

View Restructuring & Insolvency by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Fraudulent trading claims under sections 213 and 246ZA of the Insolvency Act 1986

Fraudulent trading claims under sections 213 and 246ZA of the Insolvency Act 1986A fraudulent trading claim arises under two separate statutory routes. Firstly, fraudulent trading is a criminal offence under section 993 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006). Secondly, a civil remedy arises under

Rule 1.35(2)(b) of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016 (IR 2016), SI 2016/1024 states that an

Rule 1.35(2)(b) of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016 (IR 2016), SI 2016/1024 states that an application notice must state the section of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) or paragraph of a Schedule to the IA 1986 or the number of the IR 2016 rule under which it is made. What are the

Wrongful trading claims under sections 214 and 246ZB of the Insolvency Act 1986

Wrongful trading claims under sections 214 and 246ZB of the Insolvency Act 1986What is wrongful trading?Wrongful trading is a claim which arises under sections 214 (liquidation) and 246ZB (administration) of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986).The essence of a wrongful trading claim is that:•the

Possession and sale applications in respect of a bankrupt's family home

Possession and sale applications in respect of a bankrupt's family homeWhen the bankrupt's estate vests in the trustee in bankruptcy (trustee) immediately following the trustee's appointment, the bankrupt's property (including their place of residence) will usually be the most valuable asset in the
Fraudulent trading claims under sections 213 and 246ZA of the Insolvency Act 1986

Fraudulent trading claims under sections 213 and 246ZA of the Insolvency Act 1986

Fraudulent trading claims under sections 213 and 246ZA of the Insolvency Act 1986A fraudulent trading claim arises under two separate statutory routes. Firstly, fraudulent trading is a criminal offence under section 993 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006). Secondly, a civil remedy arises under

Rule 1.35(2)(b) of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016 (IR 2016), SI 2016/1024 states that an

Rule 1.35(2)(b) of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016 (IR 2016), SI 2016/1024 states that an

Rule 1.35(2)(b) of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016 (IR 2016), SI 2016/1024 states that an application notice must state the section of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) or paragraph of a Schedule to the IA 1986 or the number of the IR 2016 rule under which it is made. What are the

Wrongful trading claims under sections 214 and 246ZB of the Insolvency Act 1986

Wrongful trading claims under sections 214 and 246ZB of the Insolvency Act 1986

Wrongful trading claims under sections 214 and 246ZB of the Insolvency Act 1986What is wrongful trading?Wrongful trading is a claim which arises under sections 214 (liquidation) and 246ZB (administration) of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986).The essence of a wrongful trading claim is that:•the

Possession and sale applications in respect of a bankrupt's family home

Possession and sale applications in respect of a bankrupt's family home

Possession and sale applications in respect of a bankrupt's family homeWhen the bankrupt's estate vests in the trustee in bankruptcy (trustee) immediately following the trustee's appointment, the bankrupt's property (including their place of residence) will usually be the most valuable asset in the