2016–17—Autumn Statement to Finance Bill

ARCHIVED: This Overview has been archived and is not maintained.

This subtopic draws together content on the 2016-17 Budget and Finance Bill, starting with the Autumn Statement in November 2016, through the Budget in 2017 to the passage through parliament of the Finance (No.2) Act 2017. For more information on the annual Budget and Finance Bill process, see Practice Note: The Budget and Finance Bill process.

All the analysis produced in this topic will be collected in Practice Note: Autumn Statement 2016 to Finance Bill 2017—Tax Analysis.

Finance (No 2) Act 2017

The government published the second Finance Bill of 2017 on 8 September 2017, containing most of the provisions that were dropped from the previous Bill, and accompanying explanatory notes. For more on this, see News Analysis: Publication of second Finance Bill 2017.

On 13 July 2017, when the government confirmed its intention to legislate the withdrawn provisions, it released amended legislation in relation to the corporate interest restriction, hybrid mismatches, the substantial shareholdings exemption, loss reliefs and disguised remuneration. For information on the key differences between the legislation

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Tax News

Tax weekly highlights—21 November 2024

This week's edition of Tax weekly highlights includes: (1) the Supreme Court decision in Refinitiv concerning the interaction between the diverted profits tax and an advance pricing agreement, and (2) the Supreme Court decision in Cobalt Data Centre on the scope of the enterprise zone allowance.

UT finds FTT made errors when setting aside HMRC best judgment assessment (HMRC v Sintra Global)

Tax analysis: In Sintra Global, the Upper Tribunal (UT) set aside the decision of the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) insofar as it related to a notice HMRC had issued to an individual making him liable for the payment of a civil evasion penalty charged against a company he was a director of. The UT found that the FTT had failed to follow the guidance provided by the Court of Appeal in Pegasus Birds in relation to the assessment the penalty was based on.

Supreme Court rules on the scope and limitations of the enterprise zone tax incentive (R (oao Cobalt Data Centre) v HMRC)

The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the taxpayers’ argument that the relevant expenditure fell within section 298(1) of the Capital Allowances Act 2001 (CAA 2001) and concluded that, based on the proper interpretation of that provision, the expenditure was not incurred under a contract executed prior to the conclusion of the initial ten-year period, as required. Adam Craggs, partner at RPC, discusses the implications that the judgment has on taxpayers going forward.

Consultation on expanding tax conditionality to new sectors

Environment analysis: On 30 October 2024, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) issued a consultation on ‘Tackling the hidden economy: expanding tax conditionality to new sectors’. The consultation runs to 21 January 2025. Angus Evers, partner at Shoosmiths, comments on the consultation.