Derivative contracts

The rules governing the taxation of derivatives are primarily found in Part 7 of the Corporation Tax Act 2009 (CTA 2009) (CTA 2009, ss 570–710). Some secondary legislation is also relevant, notably the regulations known as the ‘Disregard Regs’ (the Loan Relationships and Derivative Contracts (Disregard and Bringing into Account of Profits and Losses) Regulations 2004, SI 2004/3256).

The derivative contracts rules only apply to companies within the charge to UK corporation tax.

Derivatives and their uses

While certain kinds of businesses may trade or speculate in derivative instruments, derivatives are more usually held either as investments or to mitigate (ie hedge) a company’s exposure to a particular risk or potential liability, eg to changes in cash flow or in the fair value of assets, or to credit risk. Derivatives, such as options, futures and swaps can be used to smooth the volatility associated with interest rates, currency or commodity prices. In that sense, their use can provide certainty to a company in respect of its financial position, especially in relation to future liabilities.

A derivative is a contract between

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Tax News

FTT upholds Sch 36 information notice (AAA Oriental Ltd v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In AAA Oriental Ltd, the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) dismissed an appeal against an information notice issued by HMRC under FA 2008, Sch 36.

Court of Appeal furthers uncertainty over salaried members rules (Bluecrest v HMRC)

Tax analysis: The ongoing dispute between HMRC and Bluecrest Capital Management on the scope of the salaried members rules has been sent back to the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) by the Court of Appeal. Any hope that the Court of Appeal could bring some clarity to proceedings was dashed as it held that both parties, the Upper Tribunal (UT), the FTT and HMRC's own published guidance were all wrong and the only recourse was for the FTT to effectively start again. The Court of Appeal held that only influence arising from the terms of the partnership itself, in effect the partnership agreement, was relevant and that practical or de facto influence seemingly does not matter at all. Since neither Tribunal had approached the question in this light hitherto, the Court directed that they now do so now. Written by Tom Rank, tax partner at DWF Law LLP.

Tax weekly highlights—30 January 2025

This week's edition of Tax weekly highlights includes: (1) HMRC’s announcement of a consultation on draft MTT and DTT supplementary guidance, (2) News Analysis of the FTT’s decision in Bryan Robson Limited that consideration attributable to the exploitation of image rights was outside the scope of IR35, and (3) News Analysis of the UT’s decision on EIS disqualifying arrangements in Hoopla Animation Ltd.

UK government launches review of HMRC loan charge

Law360, London: UK tax authority's loan charge targeting individuals who incurred hefty tax bills after signing up for disguised remuneration schemes, a move critics claim has unfairly hit tens of thousands of contractors.