EIS relief

EIS relief

The Enterprise Investment Scheme (EIS) offers substantial tax incentives to individual investors in smaller, higher-risk companies. This overview summarises the tax reliefs that are available and explains when EIS applies, ie what EIS conditions have to be met by the company, the investors, the shares, the use of funds and the arrangements as a whole in order for EIS reliefs to be available.

EIS tax reliefs

In summary, tax reliefs under EIS are as follows:

•
income tax relief at 30% of the amount invested up to £1m (or up to £2m provided at least £1m is invested in shares in knowledge intensive companies) (subject to clawback if the shares are disposed of within three years)
•
capital gains tax (CGT) exemption on any capital gain realised on a disposal of shares that qualified for EIS relief and were held for three years
•
CGT deferral relief allowing an investor to defer capital gains realised on disposal of assets to the extent that gains are reinvested in shares qualifying for EIS relief, with the option of an associated deferral of business asset disposal relief (formerly entrepreneurs' relief)
•
capital losses

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Tax News

Autumn Budget 2024—Tackling tax non-compliance in the umbrella company market

Tax analysis: At the Autumn Budget 2024 on 30 October 2024, it was announced there would be changes regarding who is responsible for pay as you earn/National Insurance contributions (PAYE/NIC) when workers are paid through an umbrella company. Robert Woodward, tax associate director and John Chaplin, partner at BDO analyse the changes.

Tax weekly highlights—21 November 2024

This week's edition of Tax weekly highlights includes: (1) the Supreme Court decision in Refinitiv concerning the interaction between the diverted profits tax and an advance pricing agreement, and (2) the Supreme Court decision in Cobalt Data Centre on the scope of the enterprise zone allowance.

UT finds FTT made errors when setting aside HMRC best judgment assessment (HMRC v Sintra Global)

Tax analysis: In Sintra Global, the Upper Tribunal (UT) set aside the decision of the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) insofar as it related to a notice HMRC had issued to an individual making him liable for the payment of a civil evasion penalty charged against a company he was a director of. The UT found that the FTT had failed to follow the guidance provided by the Court of Appeal in Pegasus Birds in relation to the assessment the penalty was based on.

Supreme Court rules on the scope and limitations of the enterprise zone tax incentive (R (oao Cobalt Data Centre) v HMRC)

The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the taxpayers’ argument that the relevant expenditure fell within section 298(1) of the Capital Allowances Act 2001 (CAA 2001) and concluded that, based on the proper interpretation of that provision, the expenditure was not incurred under a contract executed prior to the conclusion of the initial ten-year period, as required. Adam Craggs, partner at RPC, discusses the implications that the judgment has on taxpayers going forward.