Entity classification

It is necessary to characterise overseas entities as with transparent or opaque for UK tax purposes, as this will determine how they (and their members and potentially other persons connected with them) are taxed.

UK case law and HMRC interpretation

UK legislation provides little guidance on whether an overseas entity is to be treated as transparent or opaque for UK tax purposes. However, there have been a number of key cases that have considered the treatment of specific overseas entities. In response to this case law, HMRC has published guidance on the factors to be considered when classifying a foreign entity for UK tax purposes. HMRC has also published a non-definitive list of entities which it considers to be either opaque or transparent.

For an explanation of the relevant case law and HMRC’s views on entity classification, see:

•
Practice Note: Entity classification case law and HMRC's interpretation—which explains the circumstances in which overseas entities are classified as either transparent or opaque for UK tax purposes by reference to the applicable case law (eg Dreyfus, Ryall

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Tax News

Tax weekly highlights—21 November 2024

This week's edition of Tax weekly highlights includes: (1) the Supreme Court decision in Refinitiv concerning the interaction between the diverted profits tax and an advance pricing agreement, and (2) the Supreme Court decision in Cobalt Data Centre on the scope of the enterprise zone allowance.

UT finds FTT made errors when setting aside HMRC best judgment assessment (HMRC v Sintra Global)

Tax analysis: In Sintra Global, the Upper Tribunal (UT) set aside the decision of the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) insofar as it related to a notice HMRC had issued to an individual making him liable for the payment of a civil evasion penalty charged against a company he was a director of. The UT found that the FTT had failed to follow the guidance provided by the Court of Appeal in Pegasus Birds in relation to the assessment the penalty was based on.

Supreme Court rules on the scope and limitations of the enterprise zone tax incentive (R (oao Cobalt Data Centre) v HMRC)

The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the taxpayers’ argument that the relevant expenditure fell within section 298(1) of the Capital Allowances Act 2001 (CAA 2001) and concluded that, based on the proper interpretation of that provision, the expenditure was not incurred under a contract executed prior to the conclusion of the initial ten-year period, as required. Adam Craggs, partner at RPC, discusses the implications that the judgment has on taxpayers going forward.

Consultation on expanding tax conditionality to new sectors

Environment analysis: On 30 October 2024, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) issued a consultation on ‘Tackling the hidden economy: expanding tax conditionality to new sectors’. The consultation runs to 21 January 2025. Angus Evers, partner at Shoosmiths, comments on the consultation.