Demergers

Demergers

A demerger means the separation of a company’s business into two or more parts, typically carried on by successor companies under the same ownership as the original company.

A business undergoing a demerger will want to minimise any tax charges triggered by the demerger itself. The main concerns are likely to be:

•
that the receipt of shares in the successor company by the shareholders of the target company is not charged to:
1. ◦
  income tax (or corporation tax on income) as a distribution, or
2. ◦
  capital gains tax (or corporation tax on chargeable gains) as a disposal or part disposal of their shares in the target company
•
that the disposal of the demerged business by the target company is not taxed as a chargeable gain, and that the demerger does not trigger degrouping charges (including degrouping charges under the intangible asset, loan relationships or derivative contracts rules), and
•
that the demerger does not trigger any charges to stamp taxes on shares or land

The need to obtain tax clearances must be factored into the transaction timetable.

For an introduction to the different

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Tax News

FTT holds that sales of occupation income provisions applied to capital sum received by the taxpayer (Rupert Grint v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In Rupert Grint v HMRC, the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) found that the sales of occupation income anti-avoidance rules applied to a capital sum received by the taxpayer on the incorporation of his business. The anti-avoidance provisions were engaged as, although there were commercial reasons for the incorporation, one of the main objects of the arrangements was the avoidance or a reduction in income tax. The FTT also held that the closure notice was validly issued despite referring to the wrong legislative provision.

FTT holds discrimination settlement payment not taxable (L v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In L v HMRC, the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) held that the part of a settlement payment which related to a discrimination claim fell outside the scope of income tax. This was on the basis that the payment was not ‘from employment’; instead it was made because the discrimination had deprived the former employee of the opportunity to perform her full role, causing financial loss.

FTT allows taxpayer’s R&D appeal (Stage One Creative Services Ltd v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In Stage One Creative Services Ltd v HMRC, the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) allowed the taxpayer’s appeal, holding that it was entitled to research and development (R&D) relief under the pre-1 April 2024 regime for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

UT considers taxpayer’s application for permanent anonymity and third party disclosure request (HMRC v The Taxpayer and Others)

Tax analysis: The Upper Tribunal (UT) rejected a taxpayer’s application for permanent anonymity, following the taxpayer's decision to withdraw their substantive appeal with the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT). The UT further granted a third party limited access to the FTT’s previous case management decision. The UT’s decision emphasises the importance placed on open justice and highlights the court and tribunals’ reluctance to permit anonymity in litigation. Written by Helen McGhee, Partner, and Megan Durnford, Associate, at Joseph Hage Aaronson LLP.