Civil appeals—general and preliminary considerations

Contents and scope

This subtopic provides guidance on general and preliminary considerations in relation to appeals in general civil litigation in proceedings before the County Court, High Court and the Civil Division of the Court of Appeal.

Significant changes were made to appeal procedure in 2016. For the provisions applicable before those changes (and for transitional provisions), see ‘Appeals before 3 October 2016’ below).

For further information on other types of appeals, see:

  1. appeals to the Supreme Court—subtopic: Appeals to the Supreme Court—overview

  2. judicial review proceedings in general civil litigation, public law litigation or criminal litigation—subtopics:

    1. Judicial review litigation—frequently asked questions [Archived]

    2. Judicial review in criminal proceedings—overview

  3. appeals in criminal proceedings—subtopic: Criminal appeals—overview

  4. appeals in detailed assessment proceedings against a decision of an authorised court officer—Practice Note: Detailed assessment—appeals

  5. appeals against committal for contempt—Practice Note: Civil contempt proceedings—appeals, purges and discharge, or

  6. appeals in distinct types of civil proceedings—see eg:

    1. employment appeals

    2. appeals in family proceedings

    3. AA 1996—challenges and appeals—arbitration—England and Wales—overview

The

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Dispute Resolution News

The Law Society’s AI strategy and response to government

The Law Society has responded to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology’s call for evidence on the AI Growth Lab, stressing the need for a proportionate regulatory approach that supports innovation while maintaining professional standards. In a press release dated 6 January 2026, the sector’s widespread willingness to embrace lawtech was highlighted, with two-thirds of lawyers said to ‘already use AI tools in their work’, alongside an ongoing uncertainty as to the risks and ‘exact requirements for data security, oversight and liability’. Separately, The Law Society’s ‘Introduction to lawtech’ guide published on 29 December 2025 observed that client demand for ‘greater efficiency, transparency and cost control, especially in corporate legal services’ has been a key driver for AI usage, with larger firms leading adoption and medium-sized firms catching up. The Law Society says it will continue to work with the government to ensure AI benefits both firms and clients, with its strategy focused on the following three key outcomes: i) innovation in legal service delivery; ii) an effective AI regulatory landscape, influenced by the legal sector; and iii) integrity through responsible AI use, supporting the rule of law and access to justice. Links to consultation responses and downloadable submissions on a range of AI-related issues, including data processing, ransomware resilience and the use of AI outputs in criminal proceedings (among others), are included on The Law Society’s ‘AI and lawtech: government policy and regulation’ page (updated on 18 December 2025), which also invites members to share their views and identify any gaps in support or guidance.

View Dispute Resolution by content type :

Popular documents