Enforcement of foreign judgments—international Q&A guides

When dealing with enforcement in the following EU countries, the Lexology Panoramic guide provides information in the form of a series of questions and answers. The questions are set out below, followed by links to the various Practice Notes, which deal with each of the countries. The latest guide is for 2023.

For information on enforcement in Singapore a Practice Note is available which has been produced in partnership with Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP, see Practice Note: Singapore International Commercial Court—enforcement.

For information on enforcement in the Channel Islands, Practice Notes are available which were produced in partnership with Ogier, see Practice Notes:

•
Enforcement guide—Guernsey
•
Enforcement guide—Jersey

International comparator tool

The International comparator tool is designed to allow lawyers to compare legal differences across two or more jurisdictions in any given practice area. Using information from the Lexology Panoramic Guides, it can generate over two billion answers to your comparison requests. This is a valuable aid to uncover issues in cross-border matters and multi-jurisdictional disputes. See: Practice Note: International Comparator tool.

Questions

1. Treaties—is your country party to any bilateral or multilateral

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Dispute Resolution News

Court of Appeal guidance on class actions, lead claims, global claims and disclosure (Alame v Shell)

Dispute Resolution analysis: The Court of Appeal has given guidance on the proper procedure for group litigation on environmental issues. Allowing the claimants’ appeal against a decision requiring the claim to be pleaded as a ‘global’ or ‘all-or-nothing’ claim, the court held this was a ‘paradigm example’ of litigation which should be progressed by lead cases. The court also highlighted the importance of disclosure in placing parties on an ‘equal footing’. While the court should be alert to disallow ‘fishing expeditions’ on disclosure, it is a powerful tool for achieving justice in cases where there is a significant asymmetry of information. Written by Harriet Campbell, senior knowledge lawyer at Penningtons Manches Cooper LLP.

Minutes of the CPR Committee meeting—1 November 2024

The minutes of the CPR Committee (CPRC) meeting of 1 November 2024 (conducted in a hybrid format at The Rolls Building (Royal Courts of Justice) and via video conference) cover a number of issues including the Law Commission consultation on the law of contempt, Closed Material Procedure, Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation, the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024, the outcome of the Workplace Claims consultation and costs budgeting light.

Online Procedure Rule Committee minutes—2024 in review

The Online Procedure Rule Committee (OPRC), established under the Judicial Review and Courts Act 2022 (JRACA 2022), creates rules governing the practice and procedure for specific types of online court and tribunal proceedings across the Civil, Family and Tribunal jurisdictions (CFT). The OPRC holds regular meetings, for which the minutes are published. This News Analysis summarises the key developments in 2024 and looks forward to potential future developments.

Dispute Resolution weekly highlights—19 December 2024

This week's edition of Dispute Resolution weekly highlights includes the Online Procedure Rule Committee’s minutes for 2024, the Minutes of the Civil Procedure Rule Committee of 1 November 2024 and the Court of Appeal decision in Bangs v FM Conway Ltd (relief from sanctions); dates for your diary; details of our most recently published content; and other information of general interest to dispute resolution practitioners.

View Dispute Resolution by content type :

News