Determining whether restrictions are enforceable

Copyright © 2024 LexisNexis

This Overview outlines the Practice Notes available in our subtopic: 'Determining whether restrictions are enforceable'.

The combined effect of the implied duty of fidelity, any fiduciary duties owed by the employee and express restrictions on competition (such as garden leave clauses) and on the use of confidential information during employment contained in the contract of employment can protect the employer against competition while the employee is employed. Post-termination restrictions (also known as restrictive covenants) can provide effective protection to an employer against competition by a former employee.

However, the protection that such provisions afford will depend on the extent to which the relevant restrictions are judged by a court to be enforceable.

Usually, the enforceability of the relevant restrictions will be judged by a court at an interim hearing of an application by the employer for an interim injunction to enforce the restriction concerned.

The Practice Notes in this subtopic examine the enforceability of post-termination restrictions against employees. The principles applicable to the enforceability of post-termination restrictions against other individuals in commercial agreements (eg partners, consultants, shareholders) are similar but not the same and outside

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Employment News

Spain can’t use immunity to block translators bias case

Law360: Spain cannot rely on state immunity to overturn a translator's harassment and discrimination claim, the Court of Appeal has ruled, finding that the conduct complained of was not part of a governmental activity.

HMCTS announces delay in new ET practice directions implementation

HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has announced a delay in the implementation of new Practice Directions for Employment Tribunals (ET) in England, Wales, and Scotland. In an email circulated to national user group members, HMCTS advised that the Practice Directions, originally scheduled to coincide with the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2025 on 6 January 2025, are now expected later in January 2025. The directions will introduce changes to the presentation of claims, responses, and statutory appeals, including restrictions on email submissions of ET3 response forms.

Lawyers warn skeletal zero-hours contract ban may backfire

Law360: A proposed reform to crack down on exploitative zero-hours contracts is so vaguely drafted that it is unworkable and risks backfiring on its aim to provide more stability for workers, lawyers and industry groups say.

ET Presidents explain how to approach existing Practice Directions and Presidential Guidance in light of new ET procedure rules

Employment analysis: Judge Barry Clarke, the President for the Employment Tribunals (England and Wales), and Judge Susan Walker, the President for the Employment Tribunals (Scotland), have published a joint letter, dated 18 December 2024, concerning the interaction between the current Practice Directions and Presidential Guidance documents and the new Employment Tribunal Rules 2024, which take effect on 6 January 2025.

View Employment by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Restraint of trade in employment

Restraint of trade in employmentThis Practice Note examines the doctrine of restraint of trade and lawful exceptions to it in the employment context.It is a basic principle of common law that an individual should be free to follow their trade or calling when, where and in what manner they wish. Lord

Decisions on post-termination restrictions and garden leave in employment contracts

Decisions on post-termination restrictions and garden leave in employment contractsThis Practice Note summarises key decisions on the enforceability of post-termination restrictions (restrictive covenants) in contracts of employment and sets out examples of cases which practitioners may find helpful

Where a confidentiality obligation in an employee’s contract of employment is made subject to a

Where a confidentiality obligation in an employee’s contract of employment is made subject to a whistleblowing carve-out, to what extent will the confidentiality restriction be enforceable against the employee post-employment if they disclose confidential information that would otherwise be required

Is a clause requiring an employee to repay relocation costs if he terminates the employment contract

Is a clause requiring an employee to repay relocation costs if he terminates the employment contract within two years of the relocation void as a penalty clause, or as a restraint of trade?It is common for employment contracts to allow the employer to recoup relocation, training and other expenses
Restraint of trade in employment

Restraint of trade in employment

Restraint of trade in employmentThis Practice Note examines the doctrine of restraint of trade and lawful exceptions to it in the employment context.It is a basic principle of common law that an individual should be free to follow their trade or calling when, where and in what manner they wish. Lord

Decisions on post-termination restrictions and garden leave in employment contracts

Decisions on post-termination restrictions and garden leave in employment contracts

Decisions on post-termination restrictions and garden leave in employment contractsThis Practice Note summarises key decisions on the enforceability of post-termination restrictions (restrictive covenants) in contracts of employment and sets out examples of cases which practitioners may find helpful

Where a confidentiality obligation in an employee’s contract of employment is made subject to a

Where a confidentiality obligation in an employee’s contract of employment is made subject to a

Where a confidentiality obligation in an employee’s contract of employment is made subject to a whistleblowing carve-out, to what extent will the confidentiality restriction be enforceable against the employee post-employment if they disclose confidential information that would otherwise be required

Is a clause requiring an employee to repay relocation costs if he terminates the employment contract

Is a clause requiring an employee to repay relocation costs if he terminates the employment contract

Is a clause requiring an employee to repay relocation costs if he terminates the employment contract within two years of the relocation void as a penalty clause, or as a restraint of trade?It is common for employment contracts to allow the employer to recoup relocation, training and other expenses