Supreme Court rejects attempt to modify fiduciary profit rule (Rukhadze and others v Recovery Partners GP Ltd and another)
A panel of seven justices sitting in the Supreme Court has unanimously declined to introduce a ‘but for’ causation test that would have allowed fiduciaries to retain profits if they could show they could have made them without breaching their fiduciary duties. The Supreme Court’s decision, featuring a leading opinion from Lord Briggs and three concurring judgments, maintains that profits made by fiduciaries are held on constructive trust for their principal from the moment they are made, regardless of whether they could have been obtained legitimately.