Trade mark transactions and management

What is a trade mark?

A trade mark’s essential function is to be a badge of origin. It distinguishes the goods and services of one undertaking from those of other undertakings. Trade marks are often in the form of words, slogans or logos, but may also comprise items including sounds, three-dimensional symbols, smells, colours, multimedia clips, patterns and holograms. However, in order to fulfil their function, they need to fulfil a range of criteria as set out below.

It is possible to rely on both registered and unregistered trade mark protection in the UK.

Trade mark legislation in the UK

The law relating to UK trade mark registrations is set out in the Trade Marks Act 1994 (TMA 1994).

TMA 1994 implemented Directive (EU) 2015/2436 into UK law (and previously, its predecessors, Directive 89/104/EEC and Directive 2008/95/EC).

The amendments to TMA 1994 to implement Directive (EU) 2015/2436 into UK law were introduced via the Trade Marks Regulations 2018, SI 2018/825, from 14 January 2019.

The Trade Marks (Amendment etc) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019, SI 2019/269 and the Designs and

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest IP News

High Court assesses damages following termination of licence to use software (THJ Systems v Sheridan)

TMT analysis: The High Court has assessed damages in a case involving the termination of a licence to use software. The case illustrates how the court approaches the task of assessing damages in business disputes of this nature. It emphasises the importance of compliance, credible evidence, and clear differentiation of claims, offering practical lessons for lawyers handling similar cases in England and Wales. Written by Helen Hart, senior knowledge lawyer at Lewis Silkin LLP.

The biggest UK IP rulings of 2024

Law360, London: Courts across Britain and Europe handed down some of the highest-profile intellectual property decisions in years in 2024, as the UK's Supreme Court settled one of the biggest trade mark cases in recent times and the lower courts weighed in on unfair advantage and fair licensing for essential patents.

UPC Court of Appeal remits Meril’s request to stay infringement proceedings pending the outcome of EPO opposition

EU Law analysis: The Unified Patent Court’s (UPC) First Panel of the Court of Appeal (CoA) sitting with only three Legally Qualified Judges, has remitted Meril’s application to the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division (RD) to stay infringement proceedings brought by Edwards pending the outcome of Meril’s European Patent Office (EPO) opposition against EP No. 3,769,722. This was on the basis that the Nordic-Baltic RD had erred in refusing the application solely on the basis that a rapid final decision could not be expected from the EPO. The CoA also confirmed that the UPC Rules of Procedure only allowed the Court to disregard requests, facts and evidence that were not submitted at first instance. However, new arguments could be submitted at appeal if they were based on existing facts and evidence. Hsu Min Chung, partner and patent attorney, and Rachel Fetches, partner and Head of Law, at HGF analyse the judgment.

iQIYI sues Chinese AI startup MiniMax for copyright infringement in landmark case

MLex: Chinese video-streaming platform iQIYI has initiated legal action in a local court against domestic AI startup MiniMax for copyright infringement related to AI model training and content generation, MLex has learned.